Is Hillary Gearing Up For Late-Stage Do-Over Against "Corrupt Human Tornado" Trump?

Is a Trump vs Hillary Round Two possible?



Based on bookies' bets and a few recent actions, speculation is once again starting to grow that Hillary Clinton may be about to enter the Democratic Party presidential nominee race...

First, the repeatedly failed presidential candidate has a suddenly full media schedule this week, making appearances on CBS Sunday Morning, Stephen Colbert, and The View among others.


Secondly, as GatewayPundit notes, in the interview with CBS Sunday Morning that is airing this weekend, Clinton said that things happened during 2016 campaign that will not happen again, implying that she may be planning to try again.

“Look, there were many funny things that happened in my election that will not happen again,” Clinton said. “And I’m hoping that both the public and press understand the way Trump plays the game.”

Clinton went on to call President Donald Trump a “illegitimate president” and accusing him of winning by using voter purging and suppression.

“I believe he understands that the many varying tactics they used – from voter suppression and voter purging to hacking to the false stories – he knows that there were just a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out like it did.”

And reflects on "losing to a corrupt, human tornado."



Thirdly, Clinton also asserted that she supports impeachment and thinks that people are attempting to spread “falsehoods” about Joe Biden.

“The most outrageously false things were said about me in 2016, and unfortunately, enough people believed them. So, this is an effort to sow these falsehoods against Biden,”


Hillary Clinton
✔
@HillaryClinton
The president of the United States has betrayed our country.

That’s not a political statement—it’s a harsh reality, and we must act.

He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free.

I support impeachment.

331K
9:15 AM - Sep 25, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
119K people are talking about this
Fourthly, she has stepped up her attacks on Trump's actions dramatically, seemingly forgetting her own:


“I don’t care who you’re for in the Democratic primary, or if you’re a Republican, when the president of the United States, who has taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, uses his position to in effect extort a foreign government for his own political purposes, I think that is very much what the Founders worried about in high crimes and misdemeanors.”



Finally, Wall Street's worst nightmare appears to be coming true as Elizabeth Warren surges to the top of prediction markets' expectations for who will get the nomination.



Source: Bloomberg

And the market is starting to pay attention to Warren's rise...



Source: Bloomberg

With Biden down - spun as "smeared by Trump" - who better than Hillary to step in statesman-like to defend Americans' democracy?

Judging by the bookies', admittedly still outside, odds, it is very possible...


We are sure President Trump will look forward to that.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political...e-do-over-against-corrupt-human-tornado-trump


Now this, in my opinion, just might work this go around. The Democrats have no viable candidate or message. While Clinton may back those ideas, she would be smart enough not to put them in the forefront. Also, all this talk of Trump going after her in the last election was horse shit. If she can walk down a set of stairs and not cough constantly she might be able to pull it off this time.

I was saying weeks ago they would bring hillary in at the last minute.

Is Hillary more likable now than she was in 2016?

If she is so delusional that she tries to run again and actually gets nominated (a long shot, I think), she'll get even fewer votes. One of the driving factors for Trump's election was hate and distrust of the completely corrupt and evil Clintons, both of whom should be doing life without parole. There would be nothing more enjoyable than watching her lose again.

Cacheman said:

Is Hillary more likable now than she was in 2016?

If she is so delusional that she tries to run again and actually gets nominated (a long shot, I think), she'll get even fewer votes. One of the driving factors for Trump's election was hate and distrust of the completely corrupt and evil Clintons, both of whom should be doing life without parole. There would be nothing more enjoyable than watching her lose again.

Click to expand...

Yes to us she is, but, the left has no chances at all with their current group. Nobody with any political savvy is running on their side. While some postulate Mr. Obama's husband might work out, I think it knows this go around is toxic on the Democratic side. Hillary on the other hand, has had all of her bad baggage put out for the public to see and still garnered all those votes.

The Democrats have two paths in front of them. The first path is to lose 2020 and come back with a successful candidate and new ideas in 2024. The second path is to just sit back, push the crazy agenda until they overwhelm the electorate via demographics and take absolute power around 2028.

Clinton went on to call President Donald Trump aN “illegitimate president” and accusing him of winning by using voter purging and suppression.


http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...son-Why-the-Dems-Really-Want-to-Impeach-Trump

Doesn't a run for the presidency give her some immunity against prosecution?

So then they'll investigate Hillary for her Russian collusion ... Right ....

Gercarson said:

Doesn't a run for the presidency give her some immunity against prosecution?

Click to expand...

She doesn’t need it.

Gercarson said:

Doesn't a run for the presidency give her some immunity against prosecution?

Click to expand...

I don't believe so. This is one of the reasons for separation of powers in the government.

Judicial branch is separate from Administrative branch.

While pressing of charges is brought by the judiciary, executing those charges falls on the executive branch.

It is possible that the judiciary might find a candidate guilty and the executive branch may not execute charges "in the interests of an unencumbered election." This may be the case in a Hillary run. Interested (and right wing) Judiciary may charge Hillary - finally - and make charges stick in a court of law. But I wager Trump will not execute sentencing and allow the election to continue unimpeded - except by popular opinion.

It is possible to elect a convicted human to office, such as James Michael Curley of Boston who was elected to Boston Alderman from a jail cell. But elections of convicted criminals are pretty few and far between and only a wellspring of popular local opinion (and Irish Immigrant influence) elected Mr. Curley. Mr. Curley was allowed to serve for the remainder of his prison term. http://downfalldictionary.blogspot.com/2018/12/james-curley-twice-convicted-mayor-of.html

Dobbin

Hillary entering the race would sure pour fuel on the fire.

Don't know how others feel, but that fire is really starting to burn in the pit of my gut. After this last week...I'm pretty PO'd. Can't be the only one.

Gercarson said:

Doesn't a run for the presidency give her some immunity against prosecution?

Click to expand...

I've read that before. It seem to only apply to opening a new investigation. Everything she's done (not making a list) would still be fair game because it's already had an investigation started before hand.
Also it only applies to the nominee not someone just running.

Isn't she dead yet?

Dennis Olson said:

She doesn’t need it.

Click to expand...

Thats right. Trump has already said " Well, Hillary's good people, she's suffered enough "

Me - Spit, Spit

WalknTrot said:

Hillary entering the race would sure pour fuel on the fire.

Don't know how others feel, but that fire is really starting to burn in the pit of my gut. After this last week...I'm pretty PO'd. Can't be the only one.

Click to expand...

No, you’re not the only one. I think you have lots of company.

WalknTrot said:

Hillary entering the race would sure pour fuel on the fire.

Don't know how others feel, but that fire is really starting to burn in the pit of my gut. After this last week...I'm pretty PO'd. Can't be the only one.

Click to expand...

You aren't

Summerthyme

NoDandy said:

Thats right. Trump has already said " Well, Hillary's good people, she's suffered enough "

Me - Spit, Spit

Click to expand...

You’re missing the point as well as laying it all on Trump, unfairly I might add. It wouldn’t matter if Trump directly ordered Barr to prosecute her. Nothing would be done. That witch is untouchable.

Unless her Parkinsons has improved, I am doubtful.

Dennis Olson said:

You’re missing the point as well as laying it all on Trump, unfairly I might add. It wouldn’t matter if Trump directly ordered Barr to prosecute her. Nothing would be done. That witch is untouchable.

Click to expand...

No, YOUR missing the point !!

Trump is blowing hot & cold. Which in my opinion makes him a questionable ally.

Which is the real Trump, when he is playing PT Barnum, and hot to Lock her Up, or when he is cold, putting on the brakes and saying she is good people ??

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ?

Then get off your lazy ass and run for the presidency. It’s obvious that you’re the only qualified person in the country. Right?

NoDandy said:

No, YOUR missing the point !!

Trump is blowing hot & cold. Which in my opinion makes him a questionable ally.

Which is the real Trump, when he is playing PT Barnum, and hot to Lock her Up, or when he is cold, putting on the brakes and saying she is good people ??

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ?

Click to expand...

It's not his choice whether or not to lock her up, Prosecutors at the DOJ decide.

Dennis Olson said:

Then get off your lazy ass and run for the presidency. It’s obvious that you’re the only qualified person in the country. Right?

Click to expand...

Wrong again ! I AM NO MORE QUALIFIED THAN YOU ARE !!!

But I do have the ability to discern when I think Trump is wrong.

I am an American citizen, and have that right !

And BTW, you did not answer my question .

You didn’t ask a legitimate question. You’re just being an asshole.

With Biden Damaged And Warren Surging, Could Hillary Clinton Still Enter The Presidential Race?
September 27, 2019 by Michael Snyder

Just a few weeks ago, it seemed exceedingly unlikely that Hillary Clinton would enter the race for the White House in 2020. But now the Biden campaign is deeply struggling, and the constant focus that the impeachment inquiry is putting on his son’s dealings in Ukraine has already significantly damaged his chances. Joe Biden’s numbers are sliding nationally, and in the early voting states they are really starting to plunge. The only thing that made him a strong candidate in the first place was the fact that he was Barack Obama’s vice-president for eight years, and unfortunately for Biden his weaknesses are really being exposed over course of this campaign.

Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren has been surging nationally, and she is now in first place in several of the early voting states. This has put the Democratic establishment in panic mode, because it now looks like Warren has a really good shot of actually beating Biden. But none of the other establishment candidates have been able to maintain any sort of traction whatsoever, and at this point none of them are even close to double digits in the major national polls. So that means that establishment Democrats need a savior, and it turns out that “savior” could end up being Hillary Clinton.

And all of a sudden Hillary Clinton is popping up all over the place in the mainstream media. She has repeatedly supported the impeachment inquiry in recent days, and she very much sounds like someone that does not plan to stay on the sidelines for much longer.

Just consider the following excerpt from an interview with Jane Pauley that will be broadcast this weekend on “CBS Sunday Morning”…

“I had a chance to visit with Nancy backstage and I really share her view that the seriousness with which she has addressed the question of impeachment is exactly in line with what a sobering decision she had to make,” Clinton said. “And now she must proceed with an impeachment inquiry into the president, who has betrayed his oath of office to uphold the Constitution and protect and defend our country. This occupant of the Oval Office poses a clear and present danger to our future and our democracy.”

“This is not a partisan political statement, it is a harsh reality, which is why the Speaker has acted. Because it goes to the core of our values, our strength, our freedom, our security, our prosperity.”

If things had gone smoothly for Joe Biden, we would not even be talking about the possibility of another Clinton run for the presidency.

But Biden’s struggles have opened up a door for Elizabeth Warren, and this week two national polls actually showed her leading Biden.

Needless to say, the Democratic establishment is really starting to become concerned, because they don’t want Elizabeth Warren to win the race. In fact, CNBC is reporting that big Democratic donors on Wall Street “are preparing to sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle” if Warren gets the nomination…

Democratic donors on Wall Street and in big business are preparing to sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle — or even back President Donald Trump — if Sen. Elizabeth Warren wins the party’s nomination.

In recent weeks, CNBC spoke to several high-dollar Democratic donors and fundraisers in the business community and found that this opinion was becoming widely shared as Warren, an outspoken critic of big banks and corporations, gains momentum against Joe Biden in the 2020 race.

So why don’t they like Warren?

Well, maybe it is because she was viciously attacking Wall Street long before she got elected to the U.S. Senate.

And of course her “wealth tax” is not winning her any friends among the Wall Street elite either. If you are not familiar with this proposal, here is a brief summary…

Consider the version of a wealth tax proposed by Elizabeth Warren. She was inspired by the work of French economist Thomas Piketty, who made the case for a global wealth tax in his blockbuster 2014 volume Capital in the 21st Century. Since then, Warren has tapped the research of UC Berkeley economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman (each of whom is also French).

Senator Warren’s proposal is straightforward. It would target the “richest 0.1 percent of Americans.” Households with a net worth of $50 million or more would pay an annual tax of 2 percent on every dollar of net worth above $50 million and 3 percent on every dollar above $1 billion. Warren believes that with this wealth tax she can raise $2.75 trillion over ten years, which is a good thing because she has a ton of new programs that she would like to implement.

This “wealth tax” would be in addition to the federal income tax, and many among the elite are deeply concerned about what this would mean for their bank accounts.

After all, how would you feel if someone came along and took 2 or 3 percent of the money out of your bank account every single year? One year might not be too bad, but after five or ten years we are talking about some real money.

In any event, the Wall Street elite do not like Elizabeth Warren at all, and so if Joe Biden can’t get the job done they need somebody else that will.

And at this moment it appears that their best alternative is Hillary Clinton.

Of course Hillary would love to redeem herself for her failure in 2016, and it is interesting to note that she does have “a full slate of media appearances scheduled next week”. The following comes from Gateway Pundit…

Speculation is starting to grow that the repeatedly failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton may try to run for office once again as she has a full slate of media appearances scheduled next week.

The former First Lady is making appearances on CBS Sunday Morning, Stephen Colbert, and The View.

The media blitz is being billed as a way to promote her and her daughter Chelsea Clinton’s new book, The Book of Gutsy Women — but comments she has been making recently have fueled theories that she may have ulterior motives.

So will Hillary actually pull the trigger and make another run for the White House?

It still feels like a bit of a long shot, but many believe that it is definitely a possibility.

Let’s keep an eye on the Biden campaign. The worse Joe Biden does, the more nervous the Democratic elite are going to become, and if things get bad enough they will literally be begging Hillary Clinton to save them.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/ar...ary-clinton-still-enter-the-presidential-race

By choosing hillary at a brokered convention it saves her from being part of the fray of the dhim candidates and also she doesn't have to stand up to the physical demands of a long campaign

both are plusses for her

who would be her running mate

From the headline of the OP: Is a Trump vs Hillary Round Two possible?

Click to expand...

Yes. As the storm clouds gather and swirl around Trump it may be a cakewalk for Hillary instead of a boxing match.

Clutch those pearls boy....

I thought folks here were expecting the michelle person to make a last minute entrance. What happened?

They dropped those pearls and picked up a different string.

The mooch can't run, she hasn't lived in the country enough years. I think she planned on it,
but thankfully they either don't pay attention to the rules or can't count. maybe both lol

parocan said:

The mooch can't run, she hasn't lived in the country enough years. I think she planned on it,
but thankfully they either don't pay attention to the rules or can't count. maybe both lol

Click to expand...

She doesn't qualify until 2021

Thats what I thought. TY

WalknTrot said:

Hillary entering the race would sure pour fuel on the fire.

Don't know how others feel, but that fire is really starting to burn in the pit of my gut. After this last week...I'm pretty PO'd. Can't be the only one.

Click to expand...

You aren't. There are many more who have become very vocal over the last few weeks, this week in particular. It's reflected in the massive amount of small donor campaign donations to the Trump campaign (last I read was around 18 million.)

Gercarson said:

Doesn't a run for the presidency give her some immunity against prosecution?

Click to expand...

^^^^^^^^^^
this … and then, ooops … statute of limitations ran out. Sorry folks there's nothing we can do

Hillary *is* running...here's one of her campaign posters...

Dennis Olson said:

You’re missing the point as well as laying it all on Trump, unfairly I might add. It wouldn’t matter if Trump directly ordered Barr to prosecute her. Nothing would be done. That witch is untouchable.

Click to expand...

Bogey said:

. . . ooops . . . statute of limitations ran out. Sorry folks there's nothing we can do

Click to expand...

Not entirely true - there is always the issue of conservative patriots weighing in . . . as Jefferson commented upon, and as has been discussed numerous times, previously.


intothegoodnight

Meadowlark said:

Unless her Parkinsons has improved, I am doubtful.

Click to expand...

That, or her "double" is finally "up to speed, and ready to rumble."


intothegoodnight

Finally, a democratic candidate not ashamed to be seen with the American flag.

Guaranteed, they have many plays on the shelf and have an army of marxist sympathizers working day and night, to bury us.
The dems are out for total power and the complete subjugation of any and all on the right.

intothatgoodnight said:

Not entirely true - there is always the issue of conservative patriots weighing in . . . as Jefferson commented upon, and as has been discussed numerous times, previously.


intothegoodnight

Click to expand...

It sounds like you’re advocating assassination. We don’t allow that discussion here.