EBOLA Amber Vinson wants money back from Bridal Shop she shut down!

Fly Girl

Veteran Member
Fair Use

Can't make this up. SMH. :sht:


Bride-to-be at center of Ebola scare wants refund for bridesmaids

By Cheryl Powell
Beacon Journal medical writer


Published: November 24, 2014 - 06:28 PM | Updated: November 24, 2014 - 07:07 PM
A request from the bride-to-be at the center of the recent Ebola scare has left an Akron bridal shop owner feeling jilted.

An attorney representing Texas nurse Amber Vinson is asking Coming Attractions Bridal & Formal shop to refund a total of $480 in deposits and payments that four of her bridesmaids made for their dresses.

The Akron bridal shop closed for several weeks last month after being notified Vinson tested positive for the deadly viral disease within days after visiting the store with her bridesmaids.

Owner Anna Younker said the store lost tens of thousands of dollars because of the closure and frightened customers’ canceled orders.

So when she first saw the letter, she figured it was an apology.

Instead, Dallas attorney Stephen F. Malouf requested the refund and notified Younker that Vinson has decided to use another bridal store for her nine bridesmaids’ dresses “in order to minimize additional public scrutiny.”

“Would you kindly advise whether this is agreeable to Coming Attractions?” Malouf asked. “If it is not, would you ask your attorney to contact me to discuss this matter?”

“Are you kidding me?” Younker thought as she read the letter.

Younker said she never received a phone call from Vinson or any of her bridesmaids before getting the request from the attorney.

“This is like the icing on the cake for her to ask,” the bridal store owner said. “By canceling completely because she wants to go somewhere else, that’s like a slap in the face to me.”

The store’s policy typically prohibits refunds or order cancellations, but Younker said she makes exceptions in special circumstances.

“I couldn’t believe she didn’t at least call me and have some discussion on why,” Younker said. “Maybe I would have considered it differently.”

Molouf said he tried to call Younker to discuss the situation before sending the letter.

“I’m sorry that the shop is upset,” he said. “This was an effort to help the shop and Amber. Amber feels strongly that the publicity was such it was harming the business and she didn’t want to add any further scrutiny to it. This was a purely innocent request and I’m sorry it wasn’t received in the spirit in which it was sent.”

Vinson became the second nurse at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital diagnosed with Ebola after caring for a patient who died of the disease. She has since recovered.

At the height of the watch period, more than 160 Ohio residents — including customers who visited the bridal shop at the same time — were monitored by public health officials for symptoms.

Health officials have said Vinson wasn’t showing signs of Ebola when she visited the store with her bridesmaids and didn’t try on dresses.

Ebola is transmitted through direct contact with bodily fluids of a person infected with the viral disease who is experiencing symptoms, such as fever, headache, vomiting, diarrhea and unexplained bruising.

Younker opted to close the store during the 21-day incubation period after Vinson’s visit and had the shop cleaned using ultraviolet light technology before reopening earlier this month.

Vinson received her dress from the store in the summer, Younker said. The store owner planned to call Vinson as soon as her wedding veil arrived to check on her plans for ordering the rest of the bridesmaids’ dresses.

“If that’s how she feels, I can’t force her to continue to order,” Younker said. “But for me to hand over a refund, it’s not feasible. It doesn’t make sense. I’m out a lot of money.”

Cheryl Powell can be reached at 330-996-3902 or cpowell@thebeaconjournal.com. Follow Powell on Twitter at twitter.com/CherylPowellABJ.



Find this article at:
http://www.ohio.com/news/local/brid...a-scare-wants-refund-for-bridesmaids-1.544071


Click to Print

Copyright © 2014 Ohio.com
 

naturallysweet

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I excused the nurse getting on the plane because she was doing what the CDC told her. But this is ridiculous. Not only did she cost this poor woman thousands of dollars, she's adding insult to injury and demanding a refund?

Is everyone insane in this world?
 

yellowlabz

Veteran Member
Ugghh....that is just so ignorant of her! I posted an article about Zales giving her a free engagement ring because hers was disposed of when they cleaned her apartment. Obviously she doesn't know how to "pay it forward".
 

imaginative

keep your eye on the ball
$480? Is the attorney going to fly into Akron Ohio to press charges? How much is he charging Vinson?

The shop ought to be suing Vinson
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
I don't know how the shop can sue someone for visiting when she was told by the CDC it was fine and she was planning her wedding; I feel very sorry for the shop owner but a deposit was paid; the deposit should be refunded. The shop owner is an unfortunate victim here but lets stop blaming the nurse for living her life when she was told by those who were supposed to be authorities on the subjects that she was free to do so.

The real culprits here (who again probably can not be sued) are the CDC and those who put political pressure on the CDC and the hospital to pretend that everything was normal, everything was fine and that the bio II level protocols (much cheaper and easier to implement that the almost impossible bio IV) were just fine and dandy, see no one got sick...er..a..wrong.

It is natural to want to blame people when things go belly up, but in this case (and the cases of the other nurses and health care workers) blame needs to go where it belongs; this women had a contract, I can totally understand the shop owner not being able to fill the order but the deposit should be returned unless the poor lady has to file bankruptcy and then our nurse just gets in line with all the other creditors.
 

Fly Girl

Veteran Member
I don't know how the shop can sue someone for visiting when she was told by the CDC it was fine and she was planning her wedding; I feel very sorry for the shop owner but a deposit was paid; the deposit should be refunded. The shop owner is an unfortunate victim here but lets stop blaming the nurse for living her life when she was told by those who were supposed to be authorities on the subjects that she was free to do so.

The real culprits here (who again probably can not be sued) are the CDC and those who put political pressure on the CDC and the hospital to pretend that everything was normal, everything was fine and that the bio II level protocols (much cheaper and easier to implement that the almost impossible bio IV) were just fine and dandy, see no one got sick...er..a..wrong.

It is natural to want to blame people when things go belly up, but in this case (and the cases of the other nurses and health care workers) blame needs to go where it belongs; this women had a contract, I can totally understand the shop owner not being able to fill the order but the deposit should be returned unless the poor lady has to file bankruptcy and then our nurse just gets in line with all the other creditors.

You are correct about a contract. Most shops around here are a no refund policy. Stated very clearly. I have been to that shop and they are the same as all the others. The article states the owner said no refund is her policy. If that is the case, then the customer is not due a refund. But this special snowflake is different, apparently.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
I don't know how the shop can sue someone for visiting when she was told by the CDC it was fine and she was planning her wedding; I feel very sorry for the shop owner but a deposit was paid; the deposit should be refunded. The shop owner is an unfortunate victim here but lets stop blaming the nurse for living her life when she was told by those who were supposed to be authorities on the subjects that she was free to do so.

The real culprits here (who again probably can not be sued) are the CDC and those who put political pressure on the CDC and the hospital to pretend that everything was normal, everything was fine and that the bio II level protocols (much cheaper and easier to implement that the almost impossible bio IV) were just fine and dandy, see no one got sick...er..a..wrong.

It is natural to want to blame people when things go belly up, but in this case (and the cases of the other nurses and health care workers) blame needs to go where it belongs; this women had a contract, I can totally understand the shop owner not being able to fill the order but the deposit should be returned unless the poor lady has to file bankruptcy and then our nurse just gets in line with all the other creditors.


I believe it's the BRIDE who is suing the SHOP....
 

Fly Girl

Veteran Member
I believe it's the BRIDE who is suing the SHOP....

I think she might have been responding to Imaginative saying the shop should sue Amber. I recognize the attorney from Dallas. Not surprising at all. It appears to be a demand letter; no suit yet. Would be worth moving back to Summit County for a shot on that jury!!!
 

naturallysweet

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I don't know how the shop can sue someone for visiting when she was told by the CDC it was fine and she was planning her wedding; I feel very sorry for the shop owner but a deposit was paid; the deposit should be refunded. The shop owner is an unfortunate victim here but lets stop blaming the nurse for living her life when she was told by those who were supposed to be authorities on the subjects that she was free to do so.

The real culprits here (who again probably can not be sued) are the CDC and those who put political pressure on the CDC and the hospital to pretend that everything was normal, everything was fine and that the bio II level protocols (much cheaper and easier to implement that the almost impossible bio IV) were just fine and dandy, see no one got sick...er..a..wrong.

It is natural to want to blame people when things go belly up, but in this case (and the cases of the other nurses and health care workers) blame needs to go where it belongs; this women had a contract, I can totally understand the shop owner not being able to fill the order but the deposit should be returned unless the poor lady has to file bankruptcy and then our nurse just gets in line with all the other creditors.

The shop owner could fulfill the contract, the heartless bride changed her mind and decided to get her dresses elsewhere.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
I believe it's the BRIDE who is suing the SHOP....
Yes I know, I should have quoted the person who said "the shop should sue her" and yes, if there is a no refund policy in the contract; then she doesn't get a refund, I was not aware of that and it does make a huge difference. So, if there is a no refund policy then yes she is in the wrong, but no I don't see "how the shop" can sue her either; it wasn't like she went in an torched the place and had the criminal charges brought but they feel they have a civil case for loss of business.

It is really sad and I really feel bad for the shop owner and anyone else whose business was affected by this but go after the CDC and the people giving them orders.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Especially if she chose to buy the dresses elsewhere then she should get nothing, if there is a no refund policy; one of the problems with responding to news stories is not having all the information always in one place.
 

Faroe

Un-spun
I took the suggestion of the shop owner sueing as tongue-in-cheek.

Nevertheless, I DO hope the owner stands her ground and keeps the deposit. Here is the quote from the lawyer with Nurse Vinson's lame excuse for wanting to finish the business elsewhere:

“I’m sorry that the shop is upset,” he said. “This was an effort to help the shop and Amber. Amber feels strongly that the publicity was such it was harming the business and she didn’t want to add any further scrutiny to it. This was a purely innocent request and I’m sorry it wasn’t received in the spirit in which it was sent.”

....and how about that for a patronizing tone.
What is wrong with these people?
 

Palmetto

Son, Husband, Father
No attorney worth his salt would spend one minute on a case of $475.

This is a CYA letter and posturing by her attorney for the suit soon to come from the dress store owner.

Notice how the letter paints his client as graciously looking out for the business.

Don't take this at face value.

Palmetto
 

Trivium Pursuit

Has No Life - Lives on TB
No attorney worth his salt would spend one minute on a case of $475.

This is a CYA letter and posturing by her attorney for the suit soon to come from the dress store owner.

Notice how the letter paints his client as graciously looking out for the business.

Don't take this at face value.

Palmetto

What per cent of the American public has your level of discernment on this? P.T. Barnum was right.

Also, Andy Warhol once said that everyone would be famous for 15 minutes. Am increasingly seeing that some are not handling their "15 minutes" very well...
 
Top