GOV/MIL Army Seeking Retirees To Come Back To Work Amid Manpower Crisis

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
Army Seeking Retirees To Come Back To Work Amid Manpower Crisis

The Army is seeking to bring back retired soldiers to fill critical manpower shortages, according to a service-wide directive published this week.

The All Army Activities (ALARACT) document describes how Army retirees can find and apply for open positions and aims to maintain a sufficient number of personnel to fill all of the Army’s authorized positions. The message comes as the service has publicly acknowledged struggles to balance a shrinking workforce with the demands of sprawling global mission sets as recruitment woes persist for a third year in a row.

“A review of commands’ requests for [the] fill of authorized personnel vacancies, in conjunction with current Army manning guidance, prompted review of how the Army can fill key and critical position vacancies,” the document stated, outlining the current situation. “The retiree recall program can be an effective tool to fill personnel shortages of authorized regular Army vacancies that are considered key and essential.”

It was unclear whether the Army had already identified manning shortages to be filled or was issuing the message in anticipation of future need. The Army did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s comments by deadline.

Any Army, Reserve or National Guard soldier who qualifies as retired or will soon be retired — meaning they achieved at least 20 years of service — and anyone receiving retired pay is eligible to apply, the message states. Neither age nor disability, alone, would exclude a soldier from joining depending on the disability, and they would still have to meet the Army’s health requirements.

“There is no age limitation, although personnel older than 70 are not normally recalled,” the message states.

Those who apply for the program essentially lets the Army send them orders to return to active duty if a critical role opens that no one else can fill. However, the message does not authorize any special pay or incentives.

I don’t fully understand this memo but hey, what the hell, any Old #M1Abrams Tanker want to ride again? You remember that no matter what it’s still the #BestJobIEverHad https://t.co/gxNCkrKMa6
— Michael Liscano Jr. (@jr_liscano) March 21, 2024
The publication initially sparked confusion and irony among military professionals online regarding the program’s voluntary nature and whether it indicated deeper manning issues.

“The Army does have significant manpower shortages, but they are concentrated at the lower enlistment grades due to the recruiting crisis,” retired Lt. Col. Thomas Spoehr, an expert on defense policy and strategy and senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the DCNF. “So I am not sure this particular message does indicate a problem, since retirees are old.”

However, the Army recently acknowledged a persistent problem with roles that go unfilled for too long and proposed a reorganization that would cut down on the number of open positions by thousands.

After a year-long review of the Army’s existing force structure, published late February, the service concluded that the number and specialization of positions comprising the force did not match up with the changing security environment.

The Army is “over-structured, meaning there are not enough soldiers to fill out existing units and organizations,” the review stated. It emphasized the cuts are coming to “authorizations (spaces)” not “individual soldiers (faces).”

The Army’s current force structure assumes an active duty end strength — or total number of troops — of 494,000, according to the document. Congress capped end strength at 445,000 in the fiscal year 2024 defense policy bill, a historically low number as the Army struggled to recruit enough soldiers to meet end strength goals.

Officials justified cutting 24,000 roles that have been left empty as the Army deals with its worst-ever recruiting crisis as helping ensure the service only plans to assign and deploy the people it has available, cutting down on strain and allowing for more realistic planning.
 

Wildwood

Veteran Member
When we first went to Iraq, my daddy got a letter from the Army saying be ready to come back. He retired mid forties and had been retired fourteen years. He was at least sixty years old, in great shape and hoping to get the call. I don't think the current retirees would be as gungho and I wouldn't blame them.
 

Maryh

Veteran Member
Daughter said she would be called back to fill in when the regulars were deployed. She never said she'd be deployed. Sure hope not. She's very good at what she does so it would be a big possibility. Thought I was done worrying about her in wars!
 

medic38572

TB Fanatic
Not to hijack this thread, IF the dems can cheat and win the election, I look for biden from orders from obama to reinstate the draft for both men and women to build up the ranks for cannon fodder.

And that is exactly why they are going to recall all these vets who can still fight! If they move them across the world, they have no one left here to fight off the surge of illegals when it happens. Almost all the vets I know have skills, they become cannon fodder our kids overseas become cannon fodder and those of us who are left here are left to fight against what is coming.
 

Rabbit

Has No Life - Lives on TB
If they sign back up do they need to go to a "Trans", or LBGQTRXYZ training seminar before being re-instated? Inquiring minds want to know!
That is why most of them quit in the first place, according to some of my retired military friends, the woke crap, and the enepts who were promoted up and in charge. Ridiculous and dangerous.

Can you imagine a drill sergeant not being allowed to yell at recruits because it will hurt their feelings? And forget about the don't ask don't tell, our military is a laughing stock.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
I was a slow learner. By my request was recalled in 2007. A great blessing in many ways.
I seriously considered going back in after 9-11. Only out for just over 6 years, still in good shape... But I'd have had to be retrained since my job had gone away with F-4s. If I'd been doing something non- airframe specific and could slide right into a position it would have been different.

Lots of guys with F-4, F-111, C-141 and SR-71 experience were totally unfamiliar with more modern systems and would have spent a year getting trained on newer systems to be up to speed for field deployment.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
That very well may be the bigger issue.

It's not so much a lack of bodies but is it a glaring lack of expertise in critical positions?
It is.

When the Air Force retiree callback story came out it stated that returning retirees would go into desk jobs. Because all the mid-career folks bailed out three years ago there are now no end of career folks to fill the supervisor/manager positions.

No way I'd go back in to spend my time filling out performance reports, trying to keep Private Snuffy in line and getting beat over the head by command over all the issues of running a military, plus teaching mid-career folks everything they need to know when time comes to take over.
 
Last edited:

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
My husband is retired Army and a Ranger and I know that he would love to join the Army again.

I’m not sure if I should show him this article or not! Lol.
Just tell him he'll be commanding a desk if he goes back. Won't be any of the fun stuff involved for those who go back in.
 
Top