TECH India’s new sub-fired missile heats up regional arms race

jward

passin' thru

India’s new sub-fired missile heats up regional arms race​





India’s imminent test of a submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM) marks a significant step in its naval modernization, strategic deterrence vis-à-vis Pakistan and rising competition with China in the Indian Ocean. The preannounced test, however, could serve to cool bubbling tensions with Pakistan.

This month, multiple media sources reported that India is set to test in March a 500-kilometer range SLCM from its east coast. The SLCM, developed by the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), will likely be fitted on indigenously manufactured conventional submarines (SSK) planned by the Indian Navy under Project 75 India.
Project 75 India, also known as the Kalvari-class SSK, is a French-designed Scorpene SSK of which India has five and plans to have nine in service.

India’s new SLCM has two variants: the Land Attack Cruise Missile (LACM) and the Anti-Ship Cruise Missile (ASCM). Both feature technologies like thrust vector control, in-flight wing deployment and in-flight engine start.
The SLCM is also expected to be sold to friendly countries after being thoroughly tested and inducted into the Indian military.
Its capabilities are similar to the Nirbhay ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM), which has a 450-kilogram payload and an 800-1,000 kilometer range, according to Missile Threat.

The Nirbhay is launched from a land-based mobile launcher and can carry unitary or cluster high explosive warheads or a 12-kiloton nuclear warhead. It is equipped with a solid fuel booster motor jettisoned shortly after launch then switches to a turbojet engine with a speed of Mach 0.65.
The Missile Threat report says that an inertial navigation system (INS)/GPS receiver guides the Nirbhay and an indigenous Indian satellite navigation system can be used to improve its accuracy. India has also tested an SLCM version of its Brahmos supersonic cruise missile.

In March 2013, Brahmos Aerospace reported that the Brahmos SLCM was successfully launched from a submerged platform in the Bay of Bengal offshore Visakhapatnam.
Brahmos Aerospace says that the missile took off vertically from its submerged platform and followed a pre-determined trajectory for its full range of 290 kilometers.
Brahmos Aerospace claims that the Brahmos SLCM can be launched from a depth of 40-50 meters from a vertical modular launcher installed in the submarine’s hull and that it is identical to the ship-launched version.
The Times of India notes in a November 2023 article that the subsonic Nirbhay would complement the supersonic Brahmos, providing commanders with more options during a potential conflict.

Brahmos may be too expensive to deploy in large numbers, necessitating less-capable but lower-cost options such as the Nirbhay GLCM and India’s new SLCM to maintain precision long-range strike capabilities while saving Brahmos for critical targets.
BrahMos-2.png
India claims its Brahmos missile provides the capability to strike from large stand-off ranges on any target at sea or on land with pinpoint accuracy, day or night and in all weather conditions. Credit: Handout.
Those developments align with India’s efforts to establish a dedicated rocket force encompassing GLCMs, SLCMs and short/medium-range ballistic missiles (SRBM/MRBM).

SLCMs would also add a survivable sea-based element to augment India’s land-based rocket force. In December 2022, Asia Times reported on India’s efforts to build a rocket force around the Pralay tactical SRBM, with 120 slated to be deployed in underground facilities in its border states with China.
Along with SRBMs and MRBMs, India may use SLCMs as the first salvo during the opening stages of a conflict to knock out rear facilities such as command and control (C2) posts, logistics hubs, airfields and communication nodes.
A second salvo would aim to destroy air defenses, artillery pieces, missile bases and tank formations, with rocket and gun artillery attacks finishing off troops in forward-deployed positions.

Missile Threat notes in a June 2022 article that India’s missile arsenal supports its nuclear deterrent against Pakistan and China. Pakistan and China’s recent advances in missile delivery systems give India the impetus to diversify its delivery systems and increase their survivability.
The successful test and subsequent integration of SLCMs onto submarines will significantly bolster India’s naval deterrence and power projection capabilities.
SLCM-armed Kalvari SSKs could complement the nuclear-powered Arihant ballistic missile submarines (SSBN) in their role as India’s sea-based nuclear deterrent.
India currently has two Arihant SSBNs with four units planned, which could be armed with the K-15 or K-4 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM).

In an October 2022 article, Naval News notes that the K-15 SLBM can deliver a 1,000-kilogram warhead up to 740 kilometers, with the Arihant holding 12 missiles. However, Naval News reports that the K-15 may be an interim solution, with the upcoming K-4 having a range of 3,500 kilometers.
SLCMs would give India a sea-based delivery system for tactical nuclear weapons, although India’s nuclear posture focuses on strategic-level second-strike capability rather than tactical battlefield use.
Tit-for-tat, Missile Threat reported in January 2017 that Pakistan test-fired the Babur SLCM from a mobile underwater platform at an undisclosed location in the Indian Ocean.
Missile Threat says the Babur SLCM has a 450-kilometer range, underwater-controlled propulsion and advanced guidance and navigation.
However, the source says that several Indian news outlets attempted to debunk Pakistan’s 2017 Babur SLCM test, citing conflicting satellite imagery of the landscape as evidence.

Nevertheless, Missile Threat notes that the Babur GLCM can carry a 450-kilogram unitary or cluster high-explosive warhead or a 10- or 35-kiloton nuclear warhead up to 350-700 kilometers.
The source says the Babur features a terrain contour-matching (TERCOM) guidance system, with upgraded variants having digital scene matching (DSMAC) and satellite guidance.
India’s SLCM test may lead to a missile race between the two longtime adversaries. Saif-ul-Haq notes in a 2021 Islamabad Policy Research Institute journal article that the rapid modernization of the Indian Navy, including its acquisition of SLCMs, has compelled the Pakistani Navy to improve its conventional and nuclear capabilities.
Zawar Jaspal notes in a November 2023 article for WE News that complex security dilemmas, such as conventional asymmetry and lowering nuclear use thresholds, intensify as India and Pakistan increase their inventories of long-range and short-range missile systems.

That underscores the increasing need for confidence-building measures (CBM), direct communication hotlines and shared norms between the two nuclear-armed rivals.
However, Shea Cotton and Anne Pellegrino mention in a November 2019 Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) article that the same positive norms that Pakistan and India have developed for ballistic missile tests are comparatively weak for cruise missiles.
The writers note that the 2005 pre-launch notification agreement between Pakistan and India excludes cruise missiles, despite being negotiated during both countries’ early stages of cruise missile development.

They point out that the growing perception of cruise missiles as a crucial strategic asset and the fear that all such missiles could potentially be nuclear-capable make the lack of oversight even more worrying.
Even so, India’s announcement of its upcoming SLCM test marks a certain improvement in the area. Whether Pakistan reciprocates to lower regional tensions is yet to be seen.


India's new sub-fired missile heats up regional arms race - Asia Times
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use......

After BrahMos Deal, India ‘Hot Contender’ To Secure $3B Contract For Philippines’ Manila Airport​

By
Ashish Dangwal
-
February 13, 2024

India and the Philippines are poised to deepen their bilateral cooperation as New Delhi moves closer to securing the contract for the flagship redevelopment project of Manila Airport.

While recent months have seen significant attention on the collaboration between the two nations on defense, mainly focusing on the BrahMos anti-ship missile, this development underscores the broadening of their partnership.

Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA), the primary international gateway in the Philippines, is currently ranked among the poorest-performing airports globally. The country wants to upgrade the airport to alleviate chronic flight delays, mitigate congestion issues, and enhance overall facilities.

There are indications that the Philippines is now on the verge of granting a contract to redevelop Manila Airport. India’s GMR Group appears to be the leading contender among four private bidders, as per reports.

In August 2023, the Philippines launched a bid for a US$3 billion redevelopment project to address the chronic operational issues plaguing Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA).

The facility, operating at 50 percent over capacity, had previously encountered two unsuccessful attempts to expand its operations.

The Manila airport project includes nearly doubling the yearly passenger capacity to 62 million and entails a 15-year concession agreement, with the possibility of a 10-year extension.

Philippine Undersecretary for Planning and Project Development at the Department of Transportation Timothy John said three of the four international consortiums vying for the project had been shortlisted.

The objective is to finalize the concession award and sign the agreement by February 15, with actual development slated to commence between the second and third quarters of the year.

However, the timeline for commencement hinges on the terms for the handover of work between the government and the winning bidder. A consortium led by India’s GMR Group has emerged as a potential frontrunner under a public-private partnership model.

The report mentioned that GMR Group has proposed sharing up to 33.3 percent of annual revenues with the Philippine government.

The Manila International Airport Consortium, spearheaded by Global Infrastructure Partners and recently acquired by US asset management firm BlackRock, comprising six Filipino family conglomerates, proposes to allocate 25.91 percent of revenue to the Philippine government.

Following closely is a consortium led by the Philippine multinational corporation San Miguel Holdings Corp, which has offered to share up to 82.16% of revenue with the government, making it the highest bidder.

However, concerns about the business viability of such a high revenue-sharing model have been raised, although discussions with the government have yet to be finalized.

The Asian Airports Consortium, the fourth bidder, did not meet the requirements outlined in the technical evaluation process and thus did not qualify for further consideration in the NAIA redevelopment project.

Indian, Filipino Cooperation Amidst Heightened Chinese Assertiveness

Over the recent months, there have been recurrent tense encounters between the Philippines and China concerning the disputed Second Thomas Shoal, where the Philippines has stationed a troop detachment on a grounded naval vessel.

As recently as February 11, the China Coast Guard announced that it had repelled a Philippine Coast Guard vessel accused of intruding into waters near Huangyan Island in the South China Sea.

In light of these recurring encounters with Chinese forces, the Philippines increasingly relies on support from friendly nations. India shares a common interest with the Philippines in promoting a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific region.

New Delhi’s longstanding and robust relationship with Manila is exemplified by a series of bilateral agreements, including the contract to provide three batteries of BrahMos missiles to the Philippines.

Additionally, on August 2023, the Coast Guard leaders of India and the Philippines signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen maritime cooperation between the two nations.

By deepening defense cooperation with the Philippines, New Delhi seeks to enhance Manila’s defense capabilities, especially amidst China’s escalating assertiveness in the South China Sea.

BRAHMOS MISSILE
File Image: BrahMos Missile. Via: Indian Navy
If the GMR Group of India secures the tender, it would exemplify the expanding collaboration between India and the Philippines in the infrastructure sector.

This would also mark the firm’s third airport project in the Philippines, following its previous achievements in winning the tender for the development and operation of the Mactan-Cebu International Airport in 2014 and being awarded the project to expand Clark International Airport in 2019.

The decision to embark on the redevelopment of the Manila airport, strategically situated at the crossroads between Australia and Southeast Asia, is not only a strategic infrastructure move but also aligns with broader geopolitical dynamics.

It occurs amidst China’s proactive efforts to consolidate support for its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative, aimed at forging economic connectivity across nations through extensive trade and infrastructure networks.

In contrast, with backing from the United States, New Delhi’s active participation in the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor project represents a concerted effort to offer an alternative narrative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

During the tenure of former president Rodrigo Duterte from 2016 to 2022, the Philippines vigorously pursued Chinese investments in its infrastructure sector.

However, in the current bidding process for the Manila airport project, none of the qualified consortia include a Chinese infrastructure partner.

Nevertheless, the Philippines emphasizes that the selection criteria for the airport redevelopment will remain impartial, unaffected by any bilateral considerations.

 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Doesn't India have like one submarine and didn't they pretty much destroy it diving with a hatch open recently?
That one, the INS Arihant, spent a year in repair and is back in service. The Indian Navy has two SSBNs in service and two more under construction or fitting out and sixteen SSKs.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
That the Indians are looking at adding these cruise missiles to their SSKs bag of tricks has the potential of making Pakistan's and the CCPs tasks all the more difficult, and for that matter the turnablout as well in for example Pyongyang's serial tests and demonstrations of late of their own submarine launched and land launched LACMs.

The 6 completed and 3 on order Kalvari-class SSKs with six 21 inch/533 mm torpeado tubes could in theory max load 18 LACMs, nuclear or conventionally armed, represents a heck of a punch. That those boats are slated to get AIP in their first refits makes them all the more potent. Getting into litorral waters such armed boats could be decisive in the opening of a conflict. And when you consider the cost of operating an SSK vs an SSN, particularly if in the Bay of Bengal to deter Pakistan (leaving the nuke boats to oppose the CCP, unless basing agreements could be come to with regional allies) that would put a lot of pressure on Islamabad "to behave" at a good budgetary price.
 

tanstaafl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
That one, the INS Arihant, spent a year in repair and is back in service. The Indian Navy has two SSBNs in service and two more under construction or fitting out and sixteen SSKs.

From what I understand, SSK refers very specifically to diesel-powered anti-submarine subs. I assume you're referring to India's attack subs in general, which are probably intended to be used against surface ships, and I can't find anything referring to them as SSK's.

 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
From what I understand, SSK refers very specifically to diesel-powered anti-submarine subs. I assume you're referring to India's attack subs in general, which are probably intended to be used against surface ships, and I can't find anything referring to them as SSK's.


Yeah, I was referring to their diesel electrics in general as SSKs when they are classified as attack submarines.
 

tanstaafl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Yeah, I was referring to their diesel electrics in general as SSKs when they are classified as attack submarines.

I'm always up for learning where I'm wrong. The trick is to actually change those neuron pathways and not just default back to being wrong. I figure half to three-quarters of the stuff I've learned since childhood is now wrong. :)
 
Top