What the 2012 election means for whites

[Jeff Allen]

Thanks to another poster on another thread I ran across this vid...it is excellent and bears its own thread IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wfy4xu1-wDE&feature=player_embedded

J

 

[PresterJohn]

So much for "E Pluribus Unum"

Jared Taylor simply promotes racialist views:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Taylor

Samuel Jared Taylor (born 1951) of Oakton, Virginia, is an American journalist and an advocate of racial realism, an ideology that believes that race is a biological reality and advocates the separateness of racial groups as the key of a well-functioning society.[1] He is known for his advocacy of racial profiling as a valid technique in crime fighting and for his role as a relatively moderate voice in the American white nationalist environment.[2]

Taylor is the founder and editor of American Renaissance, a journal that describes itself as "America's premiere publication of racial-realist thought."[3] He is the president of the parent organization, New Century Foundation, and a former director of the National Policy Institute, a Georgia-based think tank. He is a former member of the advisory board of The Occidental Quarterly. Taylor and many of the organizations he is associated with are often described as promoting racist ideologies by civil rights groups, news media and academics studying racism in the US.[4][5][6] He rejects these accusations himself, saying that his views are reasonable and moderate.[7]
============================

Divide and Conquer!

 

[TerryK]

It makes many white people uncomfortable. Hell it makes me uncomfortable. Probably from years and years of exposure to politically correct racial views.
Everything he said is true.
White people have been taught and now willingly lay down their weapons and bear their throat to present themselves as a willing sacrifice on the alter of political correctness.
How did that work out for the white farmers in Zimbabwe?

The guy in the video did not advocate anything wrong. He only suggested that whites behave as other ethnic groups are behaving.
97% of Blacks voted for Obama
71% of Hispanics voted for Obama
73% of Asians voted for Obama
Only 57% of white voters voted for Romney

What is evident is that the only racial group to not vote overwhelmingly for one of their own groups, is whites.
After 40 years of indoctrination whites have been taught to shoot their own selves in the head.

Its a very interesting video. The guy says that the election would have went the other way if whites would have just convinced about 3% of their own group to vote within their group.
He also says that if whites voted for their own racial group in numbers approaching blacks, hispanics or asians they would win all the elections at least for another few times. Eventually though, changing democraphics will make that impossible.
He says that whites brought about the demographics change by completely changing the ratios of different non white groups which were allowe to enter the US.
If whites exhibited anything close to the prejudice that other races have for non members, out country would look completely different.

Everything this guy talks about is also covered in Pat Buchanans book The Death of the West. We are suiciding ourselves and have probably reached the point of no return.

At first I thought this would just be another racist video, but it isn't racist as much as it is simply truth. In fact it points out the prejudices other races have when it comes to electing people who most closely "look like them"

Is the guy a racist? Maybe, but all his facts and numbers are true. Truth is where you find it.

For those who don't want to go to Youtube

 

[CountryboyinGA]

it means we're screwed.

CB

 

[Flippper]

97% of Blacks voted for Obama
71% of Hispanics voted for Obama
73% of Asians voted for Obama
Only 57% of white voters voted for Romney

What is evident is that the only racial group to not vote overwhelmingly for one of their own groups, is whites.

I saw this before and was going to comment. 57% of whites voted for romney, what percentage voted for oboingo, why didn't they include this number? They did it for the other races. 44% of whites voted for other candidates. I'm white and did not vote for romney, and I know many others who are white who also did not vote for romney; none of us voted for obama either. The numbers are skewed, because if truth be told, oboingo needed every single black and hispanic (including too young to vote) in America to vote for him to get the 29% their numbers represent, if it was possible (it's not) needing a large portion of the 44% of whites who didn't vote for romney to break 50% of the vote.

If the above numbers are correct:
3% of all blacks who voted, did not vote for oboingo.
29% of all hispanics who voted, did not vote for oboingo.
27% of all Asians who voted did not vote for oboingo.
44% of all whites who voted did not vote for oboingo.

12.6% of the entire population of the US is black
16.4% of the entire population of the US is hispanic.
They represent 29% of America, not even a third of the whole, and that is the entire number, not just voting ages. If we assume 2/3 of them are of voting age, that would be about 20% of American voters in this election were black and hispanic. Oboingo would have to garner a minimum of 30% white votes to get 50% and break even. 57% of whites voted for romney. How many voted for other than romney but not obama? I would say a lot more than most realize, many here at TB did, and I know several in the meat world who did as well. oboingo did not have enough votes to have won anything. Period.

Obviously I'm no math whiz, and someone else can surely explain this with far fewer words and numbers, I merely am saying, none of it adds up.

 

[NC Susan]

your missing something Flipper......this isnt about the actual voters, its about an honest ballot counts
Precincts in Ohio and Philadelphia returned 99.8% Democrat for Obama results. Somalie refugees voted and so did illegal Mexicans.
NC had charters picking up mental patients and transporting them to the polls. Florida's Allan West lost, demanded a recount and now he is winning...... Millions of votes in California have not been counted or posted......YET.........

 

[Grantbo]

Balkinization of Amerika continues.

'Things' are getting closer and closer.

 

[NC Susan]

http://www.blacklistednews.com/2012_US_Elections_%E2%80%93_The_People_Have_Spoken%3A_No_Confidence/22457/0/38/38/Y/M.html

2012 US Elections – The People Have Spoken: No Confidence

November 8, 2012


Source: Tony Cartalucci, BLN Contributing Writer

Here is some math the establishment hopes you never do. Take the popular vote the newly elected president received, and see what percent of voter turnout it actually makes up. You will find that out of all eligible voters, the president is put into power with only between 25-35%. This isn’t just with President Obama in 2012, but is a common feature of most US elections, and many elections around the world.

Image: This infographic was assembled using information from CNN’s “Election 2012: Results,” USA Today’s “This year’s voter turnout may fall short of 2008,” and George Mason University’s “2012 General Election Turnout Rates.” The numbers may still change, but the difference will be negligible.
….
In countries like Thailand, where violent mobs hold the nation hostage, representing a fraction of 1% of the population, it is claimed by the Western media that these are “the people.” Come election time, the Western-backed party claiming to run on “people’s power,” garnered the support of a measly 32% of all eligible voters. Likewise in Syria, where “the people” are rising up, in a nation of 20 million – if even half rose up armed with only broom handles, the so-called revolution would have been over in a week.
This is the myth of democracy, representative governance, and manufactured dissent. It does not represent the vast majority of the people who are affected by the decisions these governments or movements then make with their self-proclaimed mandates. While numbers are still coming in, USA Today has reported that voter turnout in the 2012 US Elections most likely will fall short of 2008 elections. The article titled, “This year’s voter turnout may fall short of 2008,” quoted Michael McDonald of the George Mason University who stated:

“It doesn’t look like we had a 2008-level turnout. I’m certain about that. There was some waning of interest in voting. I don’t see this election as some kind of wholesale collapse of turnout, either.”
​

While polling experts claim the slump in voting is a result of “waning interest,” it really isn’t explained as to why interest in determining one’s own destiny would ever wane. The most likely answer is that many people feel that voting accomplishes nothing. It is done after a grueling, repetitive campaign of lofty, vague promises that most mature adults know will never be kept, by special interests who have organized against them, and are merely telling us all what we want to hear as they proceed to exploit us and plunder our nation.

 

[NC Susan]

...this isn't about the actual voters, its about an honest ballot counts ..........

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/fraud-in-pa-obama-got-over-99-of-vote.html

Thursday, November 8, 2012
Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors were Removed; Turnout Somehow "30%" Above Gov't Numbers
Posted by Aurelius at 12:16 PM

Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally) removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Mr. Obama received "astronomical" numbers in those very same regions, including locations where he received "over 99%" of the vote.

Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55.
Is it odd that a county that expelled GOP inspectors and had people openly campaigning for Obama ended with 99.5% for Obama and 9955 votes for him? It's up to you to decide.

Another problem: "Voter turnout in Philadelphia was around 60 percent, according to state election figures." In these precincts it was well over 90% according to House Speaker Sam Smith of Pennsylvania. Considering all of the other "coincidences" going on, it doesn't seem kosher.

Clear fraud, odd percentages, and numbers that don't add up? Congratulations on your re-election, Mr. Obama.

Update: Obama also won 99.8% of the vote in 44 Cleveland districts.

 

[NC Susan]

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/what-luck-obama-won-dozens-of-cleveland.html

What Luck! Obama Won Dozens of Cleveland Districts with 100% of the Vote

Posted by Aurelius at 8:56 PM Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook


President Obama must have run a great campaign considering the tremendous numbers he put up in numerous big cities. Over in Philadelphia, he was lucky enough to get 90% percent turnout in some districts with over 99% of the vote.

In Cleveland, in some districts he did even better with an astounding 100% of the vote in dozens of locations. For example, in Cleveland's Fifth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts E, F, and G 1,337 to Mitt Romney's... 0. And in case you're wondering, Gary Johnson received more votes than Mr. Romney.

Well, maybe that's just a fluke. In the Ninth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts D-G with a paltry total of 1,740 to... 3. Hey, at least Romney got .2% of the vote!
1,337-0 Okay, what if we look at an entire Ward? No way this trend continues, right? An entire ward. Why not do the First Ward? Obama won that one 12,857 to... 94. This time Romney got .7% of the vote. He's moving up in the world!

In total, there are 21 districts in Cleveland where Mr. Romney received precisely 0 votes. In 23 districts, he received precisely 1 vote. And naturally, in one of the districts where Obama won 100% of the vote, there was 100% turnout. What a coincidence!

By the way, in case you are thinking that Romney did so poorly because maybe those districts were not very populated: Nope. In those 44 districts, Mr. Obama won 14,686 to 23. That's .16% of the vote for Romney.

But Ohio's not important in the electoral college, right?

 

[NC Susan]

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/...teal-NC-Mentally-Ill-Coaxed-Into-Voting-Obama

Report: Obama Attempts To Steal NC; Mentally Ill 'Coaxed' Into Voting Obama
by John Nolte 6 Nov 2012
In Obama's name:

The father of a mentally handicapped woman claims his daughter and others were "carted off" to a North Carolina polling site last week and "coaxed" into voting for President Obama by workers of the group home where she stays -- a claim the owner of the home disputes and that apparently has not yet triggered an investigation by election officials.

The father, Cecil Pearson, said his daughter - who is 40 but has the "mentality ... of a 7-year-old" - was "brainwashed the night before" and then taken to a Roanoke Rapids polling site on Friday to vote. He said his daughter told him what happened when he picked her up on Sunday.

"They brought her a piece of paper and they indicated which block to check," Pearson told FoxNews.com. "She voted for Barack Obama and was coaxed into doing that." He claimed "more than four" people were brought to the site.

The owner of the home, Easter Seals UCP, is disputing the account. Communications officer Jeff Smith told FoxNews.com, without going into great detail, that "it's not uncommon" for the homes to provide transportation to polling sites. Asked whether Pearson's daughter or anyone that day was guided to vote for a particular candidate, he said "not to my knowledge."

 

[NC Susan]

Chapel Hill Killer Registered At and Voted From Mental Hospital

Dozens of mentally disabled registered in stepped-up efforts by state

By Don Carrington
Nov. 2nd, 2012

CJ Photo by Don Carrington
The Murdoch Developmental Center in Butner is one of several state-run residential facilities for the developmentally disabled or mentally ill where voter registration efforts targeting patients have been conducted.

BUTNER — Recent stepped-up voter registration efforts at state mental hospitals and facilities for the developmentally disabled resulted in the registration of Wendell Justin Williamson, who in 1995 killed two people in Chapel Hill and was judged not guilty by reason of insanity.

Election records show Williamson, a patient at Central Regional Hospital in Butner, was registered on Sept. 13 as an unaffiliated voter. He cast an absentee ballot that was accepted Oct. 15 by the Granville County Board of Elections.

In a street shootout in January 1995 near the UNC-Chapel Hill campus, Williamson, a law student, used an M-1 rifle to kill two strangers. The not-guilty verdict caused a national furor. He attracted additional headlines this week when a judge granted Williamson unsupervised off-campus privileges.

more at link -> http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=9635

 

[skip8]

Flipper,

I believe the reason for presenting the percentages that way is to point out that whites have been programed, indoctrinated and intimidated to behave against the natural selectivity and choosing of their own 'sameness' and 'tribe' for public office and position, because of whites past participation in the evils of segregation and apartheid-ism, which grew out of the original-sin of slavery and blacks being owned by whites. All of those evil activities have at their core the belief that blacks are not equal to whites, or are at least 'different' in some aspects, which is all considered part of the over-arching concept of 'racism'. And political correctness sees racism as only being possible in the world of whites being unfair and inconsiderate to blacks.

So white people in the US have to prove constantly in all activities that they want to embrace blacks, always act to be inclusive of blacks, and treat them as equals by selecting them for office, employment, position, neighborhoods, schools, churches etc., because for whites to act in any other manner and behavior is considered racist.

Even though it is 'natural' for a human to want to select those like themselves...those in their own 'tribe'...that activity is only embraced and really accepted when it's the behavior of minorities. Black Only churches are A-OK. Neighborhoods that are exclusively Latino? You bet! Whites attempting anything like that are Racist.

Blacks voting against a white because that candidate is white and there is another choice that is of their tribe and is black, that is natural and cool! Whites voting against a black candidate because he is black and there is another choice that is of their tribe and is white, that may seem natural too, but no, that attitude is now forever defined by the PC Doctrine and fed and supported by the concept of 'White Guilt', as Racist behavior. A white must have some other reason beyond sameness and tribe to vote for a white and against a black. It's that simple.

 

[topcat46]

Jared Taylor is speaking the absolute truth. We can either heed his warnings or we can start to prepare ourselves for life in our American version of South Africa.

 

[Cardinal]

I saw this before and was going to comment. 57% of whites voted for romney, what percentage voted for oboingo, why didn't they include this number? They did it for the other races. 44% of whites voted for other candidates. I'm white and did not vote for romney, and I know many others who are white who also did not vote for romney; none of us voted for obama either. The numbers are skewed, because if truth be told, oboingo needed every single black and hispanic (including too young to vote) in America to vote for him to get the 29% their numbers represent, if it was possible (it's not) needing a large portion of the 44% of whites who didn't vote for romney to break 50% of the vote.

If the above numbers are correct:
3% of all blacks who voted, did not vote for oboingo.
29% of all hispanics who voted, did not vote for oboingo.
27% of all Asians who voted did not vote for oboingo.
44% of all whites who voted did not vote for oboingo.

12.6% of the entire population of the US is black
16.4% of the entire population of the US is hispanic.
They represent 29% of America, not even a third of the whole, and that is the entire number, not just voting ages. If we assume 2/3 of them are of voting age, that would be about 20% of American voters in this election were black and hispanic. Oboingo would have to garner a minimum of 30% white votes to get 50% and break even. 57% of whites voted for romney. How many voted for other than romney but not obama? I would say a lot more than most realize, many here at TB did, and I know several in the meat world who did as well. oboingo did not have enough votes to have won anything. Period.

Obviously I'm no math whiz, and someone else can surely explain this with far fewer words and numbers, I merely am saying, none of it adds up.

Absolutely Flipper! That is why it is impossible for this election to have not been a vast fraud.

 

[imaginative]

Jared Taylor is speaking the absolute truth. We can either heed his warnings or we can start to prepare ourselves for life in our American version of South Africa.

Exactly. PC thinking has infected the American mind so profoundly that I wonder if we can even recover.

 

[dogmanan]

WOW it's all a fraud, don't you'all know.

And the said part is R'man and the gop are part of the fraud.

keep living in that false realty,

 

[nwillitts]

two weeks ago in wilmington,N.C a friend of my son's mom died in a motorcyle accident.this past tuesday she voted.
need i say more?

 

[Waz1152]

Can just see it now, next election Michelle will run for President and will win by a landslide

 

[DennisRGH]

I wonder what the percentage of white, pro-abortion females who voted for bozo is. And if THAT could have been the key factor that caused R to lose.

 

[pete5555]

i am a white man that loves in the usa. i feel no responsibility for what white people might have done 150 years ago. i have no white guilt whatsoever. will never vote for a black candidate . simply put i will not participate in my own destruction

 

[nwillitts]

i am a white man that loves in the usa. i feel no responsibility for what white people might have done 150 years ago. i have no white guilt whatsoever. will never vote for a black candidate . simply put i will not participate in my own destruction

exactly.

 

[Cabal]

i am a white man that loves in the usa. i feel no responsibility for what white people might have done 150 years ago. i have no white guilt whatsoever. will never vote for a black candidate . simply put i will not participate in my own destruction

I'm a white male that considers himself more Libertarian than anything else... I'll vote for whoever represents me the best. I don't care what their color is...

 

[Argonath]

I hate to say it, but did NOT the Almighty separate the peoples at the time of Babel via language, racial characteristics, and locations?

They were separated for a reason, and unless one is grafted into the Olive Tree, and strives to LIVE a righteous life, then racial division will last until the end of days when two peoples are in the same locale.

 

[nwillitts]

I'm a white male that considers himself more Libertarian than anything else... I'll vote for whoever represents me the best. I don't care what their color is...

you may not care-but the non-whites care-they want us dead.FACT!