CORONA ABC Refuses to Air RFK Jr. Comments About COVID-19 Vaccines

aznurse

Veteran Member
Epoch Times. By Zachary Stieber.

ABC Refuses to Air RFK Jr. Comments About COVID-19 Vaccines​


ABC News cut off a presidential candidate when he started talking about COVID-19 vaccines, raising concerns about censorship.


Robert Kennedy Jr., who recently announced his presidential run as a Democrat, sat down with ABC News for a lengthy interview released on April 27.


After airing clips of the interview, reporter Linsey Davis spoke to viewers.


“We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the COVID-19 vaccines,” she said. “We’ve used our editorial judgment in not including extended portions of that exchange in our interview,” Davis said.


The claims in question were not listed, and ABC did not return a request for comment.


Davis indicated that at least one dealt with the effectiveness of the vaccines.


“Data shows that the COVID-19 vaccine has prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease,” Davis said. She did not provide any citations for the claim.


“He also made misleading claims about the relationship between vaccination and autism. Research shows that vaccines and the ingredients used in the vaccines do not cause autism, including multiple studies involving more than a million children and major medical associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the advocacy group Autism Speaks,” she added.


Kennedy said that what happened violated the U.S. law that bars some media outlets from censoring candidates for public office.


“ABC showed its contempt for the law, democracy, and its audience by cutting most of the content of my interview with host Linsey Davis leaving only cherry-picked snippets and a defamatory disclaimer,” Kennedy said.


“Offering no evidence, ABC justified this act of censorship by falsely asserting that I made ‘false claims.’ In truth, Davis engaged me in a lively, informative, and mutually respectful debate on the government’s Covid countermeasures. I’m happy to supply citations to support every statement I made during that exchange. I’m certain that ABC’s decision to censor came as a shock to Linsey as well. Instead of journalism, the public saw a hatchet job,” he added.


Before airing the interview, Davis described Kennedy as “one of the biggest voices pushing anti-vaccine rhetoric, regularly distributing misinformation and disinformation about vaccines, which scientific and medical experts overwhelmingly say are safe and effective based on rigorous scientific studies.” She did not mention how the vaccines are increasingly ineffective against newer COVID-19 variants and how the vaccines have been proven to cause serious problems, including heart inflammation and death.



Critics decried ABC’s cutting of Kennedy’s remarks.


“The most outrageous part of this is ABC gets to ream RFK Jr. about vaccines during the interview but then censor his ability to even respond while forcing us to blindly trust them that his claims were ‘false,'” commentator John Ziegler wrote on Twitter. “All this after they were wrong about vaccines stopping transmission.”


Producer Alex Lorusso noted that ABC never censored officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci, who have made false and misleading claims about vaccine effectiveness, including his claims on ABC in January 2021 that if enough people were vaccinated, herd immunity would be achieved.


“They are going to censor to interfere with the 2024 election, and they won’t even hide it,” Lorusso added on Twitter.


“At the end of this otherwise interesting interview with Robert Kennedy Jr., ABC News admits they censored ‘extended portions’ relating to discussions around the COVID ‘vaccine,'” Townhall writer Scott Morefield wrote on Twitter. “If his claims are so easily disproven, why not simply disprove them instead of resorting to censorship?”
 

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
“At the end of this otherwise interesting interview with Robert Kennedy Jr., ABC News admits they censored ‘extended portions’ relating to discussions around the COVID ‘vaccine,'” Townhall writer Scott Morefield wrote on Twitter. “If his claims are so easily disproven, why not simply disprove them instead of resorting to censorship?”

This! But the lefties will nod in approval of the righteousness of ABC's censorship and never give a second thought as to why ABC avoided simply refuting the 'false claims' with a preponderance of evidence.

If the lefties really believe the claims are false why not simply let Kennedy put his foot in his mouth?
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
There IS if, every other handful of popcorn, you knock back a shot of Makers or Wild Turkey Rare Breed...(IIRC WTRB is about 120proof ABV)

With the interesting crap this year, and stuff, by the end of the Primaries, hell, I could be a PRO with an ETOH level in the 400 range, and sound sober as a judge.
 

The Hammer

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This! But the lefties will nod in approval of the righteousness of ABC's censorship and never give a second thought as to why ABC avoided simply refuting the 'false claims' with a preponderance of evidence.

If the lefties really believe the claims are false why not simply let Kennedy put his foot in his mouth?
They do the same with Trump, and this proves it's NOT just Trump - they'll censor and hound anyone that doesn't agree with them.

They don't believe in a free and fair debate in the marketplace of ideas.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
And herein you see EXACTLY what will happen at the Democratic Convention. RFKjr won't even be afforded the podium "because of what he might say."

If you don't have the podium how can any delegates "vote" for RFKjr? You have to present your "plank" first before the membership votes on it.

I correct me. RFK will speak, but it will get NO coverage on Mainstream MEEDIA. You won't even know he was there. And the vote will be UNANIMOUS for Biden on the first vote.

"Choreographed" is the word.

Dobbin
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
In a MUCH more serious note than my last comment, I anxiously await the repercussions for dissing Dem Royalty this way.

They know NOT with whom they dick around.

Gonna be an INTERESTING upcoming Pol-y-ticks season
 
Last edited:

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Gonna be an INTERESTING upcoming Pol-y-ticks season
ND, as part of anyone's platform, one ALWAYS takes issue with the platform of the opposition.

As part of that issue, one points out the WEAKNESS and FLAW of the opposition.

In today's "Bidenworld" that is considered "disinformation" and is considered a jail-able offense.

AND - in "BidenThink" nobody will consider it "election interference" when the opposing view is jailed - even if it is a candidate.

Reference Douglass Mackey "Meme" case (i.e. Free Speech) Pro-Trump social media influencer Douglass Mackey convicted of election interference

Perilous times for humans. Maybe for Equine too.

I don't do social media for EXACTLY this reason.

Dobbin
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I wish RFKjr well, but no way would I vote for him.
My position as well.
Matter of fact, I very much enjoy reading his viewpoints and what he’s doing. What a shame it is to say I’m currently enjoying what a Dem politician has to say more than what conservatives are spouting off about!

I just will not vote D.

Probably never ever, will I “vote D” …***shudders***
 

Old Gray Mare

TB Fanatic
Outstanding! Statements like these by a dying mainstream media is probably the best PR Tucker could get. Tucker probably couldn't afford to buy PR like this. This will hit not only the few conservatives still at Fox but liberals on other net works who maybe are capable of some level of cognitive thought. Many on both sides recognize the Emperor's New Clothes are inadequate.

Talk about unintended consequences.
 
Top