CORONA CDC confirms COVID codes used to 'track' people

day late

money? whats that?
I think this has more to do with facism than C-19. That's the reason for the header. But basicly, if you got the shot, they can find you.


CDC confirms COVID codes used to 'track' people

System tells health care providers vaccination status

By Bob Unruh

Published April 6, 2023 6:08pm

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has confirmed that the "medical codes" that were introduced during the COVID-19 catastrophe "are being used to track people," according to a report from The Epoch Times, which said it obtained the details in emails from the federal agency.

At the time, the codes were implemented to monitor which people were declining to accept the Anthony Fauci-recommended experimental shots, and those who were "undervaccinated."

In details obtained through a Freedom of Information Act process, the publication noted the CDC said at the time the codes were introduced, as part of the International Classification of Diseases system, confirmed they were "to track people."

The report now says, "The CDC now says it does not have access to the data, but that health care systems do."

In emails exchanged among CDC officials, one said, "The ICD codes were implemented in April 2022, however the CDC does not have any data on the codes and does not track this information. The codes were created to enable healthcare providers to track within their practices."

The scheme arose around the year 2021, and it was Dr. David Bergland, a CDC officer, who suggested, "There has been interest expressed in being able to track people who are not immunized or who are only partially immunized."

The codes identify people either as being "unvaccinated" or "partially vaccinated."

The report explains health care providers at the time said they supported the plan, as Danielle Lloyd of America's Health Insurance Plans and Adam Myrs of Blue Cross Blue Shield, wrote they "will help health insurance providers identify emollees [sic] who may benefit from outreach and further education about vaccination."

They continued, "Creating ICD-10 codes that can be tracked via claims would provide health insurance providers key information to help increase immunization rates."

This was when virtually the entirety of the U.S. health care industry and the government, under Joe Biden, were demanding, sometimes coercing, people to take the experimental shots.

There was virtually no acknowledgement at the time of the hugely negative side effects they produced in some cases, up to and including death.

In fact, government and tech companies worked diligently to suppress any suggestion that there were other useful treatments, or that the shots were a danger.

The report noted Nancy Andersen of Kaiser Permanente Health Plan and Hospitals and Erica Eastham of The Permanente Federation LLC, told the CDC: "These codes provide valuable data for understanding immunization rates and for follow-up with under-immunized patients."

Most health systems and organizations were intensely promoting the shots at the time, even for age groups that had virtually no exposure to COVID dangers. The chemical companies making the shots ended up profiting by the billions.

Some organization officials claimed the knowledge was important "because this status is a health risk factor, increasing the individual’s risk of morbidity and mortality."

But the Epoch Time said the ideology was not uniform across the medical industry.

"I have a hard time clinically seeing the medical indication of using them," Dr. Todd Porter, a pediatrician, told The Epoch Times previously. "We do not do this for influenza, which in the younger age groups has a higher IFR [infection fatality ratio] than COVID-19. Using these codes also disregards the contribution of natural immunity which research evidence shows is more robust than vaccine immunity."

U.S. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, has questioned the CDC about the issue of the codes, but the agency has refused to answer.

"I have asked five simple questions about the CDC’s unprecedented tracking of why Americans declined the COVID-19 vaccine. The CDC has so far refused to answer these basic questions. The American people deserve answers on what data CDC is gathering on Americans and why," Roy told The Epoch Times.
 
Last edited:

day late

money? whats that?
After posting this, my tired old brain half remembered something that maybe someone here can bring up from the net. Weren't there reports of unidentified particles of some kind or another that were in the shot? I DON'T KNOW, I'M ASKING. with the state of microtechnology is it possible those particles are some kind of tracking mechanism?
 

bassgirl

Veteran Member
They do the same thing with flu shots or any vaccine. They record the lot and air as numbers. They have done this for years.

Now whether anyone had access to it or used it for any purpose before I don’t know. But it has always been there for the them to use.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
They do the same thing with flu shots or any vaccine. They record the lot and air as numbers. They have done this for years.

Now whether anyone had access to it or used it for any purpose before I don’t know. But it has always been there for the them to use.

Well, of course they did. The "COVID-19" vaccines were patented years ago, and the practice of lot numbers for vaccines may have been for valid, good reasons, but it morphed into conditioning. They planned on using vaccines to reduce the global pop. for a long time, and tried to start a pandemic before "COVID," but failed.
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
After posting this, my tired old brain half remembered something that maybe someone here can bring up from the net. Weren't there reports of unidentified particles of some kind or another that were in the shot? I DON'T KNOW, I'M ASKING. with the state of microtechnology is it possible those particles are some kind of tracking mechanism?
Yes. Nano tech is a very big technology these days. Surely many have heard of the anecdotes of vaxxed people walking by various “internet of things” like washing machines that lit Up when making contact via blue tooth with the vaxxed, or YouTube videos or people with some app on their cellphones that would detect the “number” of the vaxxed...
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The salient information here is bolded:

The report now says, "The CDC now says it does not have access to the data, but that health care systems do."
In emails exchanged among CDC officials, one said, "The ICD codes were implemented in April 2022, however the CDC does not have any data on the codes and does not track this information. The codes were created to enable healthcare providers to track within their practices."

Not to say they can't or won't. It may be like herding cats to get all the repositories to "conform" to a reporting standard.

Now.

And by healthcare providers, one assumes this includes the Health Insurance industry which is hand in glove with the actual front line Medical Community: it's how they get paid.

See how this will work?

Also note that NOBODY (or very few) in the Insurance Industry are reporting the "excess death" epidemic currently ongoing. Only those "outside" the Insurance Company W2 are actually reporting the issue.

Dobbin
 

greysage

On The Level
Interestingly; my primary doctor has put in my after-visit summaries for the last year or so, that they've talked to me about C19 vaccination during our visit. He has not mentioned it to me once, nor have any of the other doctors or nurses in the practice.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Interestingly; my primary doctor has put in my after-visit summaries for the last year or so, that they've talked to me about C19 vaccination during our visit. He has not mentioned it to me once, nor have any of the other doctors or nurses in the practice.
He is "conforming" to the reporting requirement but knows your outlook since you have declined to pursue.

Right now the conformance demanded is "were you consulted." Next will be "are you current."

No vaccine currency - no Medicare, Medicaid, ObamaCare, Health Insurance, Social Security, Employment, Bank Interest/Dividend, Credit Card, Bank Account, Legal Standing. (Increasing order of "effect on your life" to assure compliance.)

Human doctors are surprisingly "conservative." It is in their training AND their confinement by the possibility of medical malpractice. I expect there will be considerable resistance to identifying vaccine currency - i.e. a lot of "lying."

Too bad your basic right to medical privacy is dependent upon another's "little white lie." You can be sure when and if this ever goes to a court test, you and the doctor will lose the case in "Social necessity and protection of the masses."

Dobbin
 

meandk0610

Veteran Member
Interestingly; my primary doctor has put in my after-visit summaries for the last year or so, that they've talked to me about C19 vaccination during our visit. He has not mentioned it to me once, nor have any of the other doctors or nurses in the practice.
Sounds like a setup so they can CYA if they ever get pushed on the number of unvaccinated patients in their practice.
 
Top