WAR Cold War II Proxy War: Azerbaijan (EU/NATO) -vs- Armenia (Russia)

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Fighting Escalates Between Armenia, Azerbaijan Over Disputed Territory
BAKU, Azerbaijan—A sharp escalation in fighting between Azerbaijan and Armenia over
the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh has left 15 soldiers dead and prompted
Russia to issue an urgent call for calm.

Associated Press

Aug. 2, 2014 11:17 a.m. ET
http://online.wsj.com/articles/figh...azerbaijan-over-disputed-territory-1406992634

Azerbaijan's Defense Ministry said Saturday that 12 of its troops have been killed in
the past four days, including four overnight. Nagorno-Karabakh's armed forces said
one of its soldiers was killed early Saturday, the third in recent days.

Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh region and some adjacent territory have been under
the control of Armenian soldiers and ethnic Armenian local troops since the end of a
six-year separatist war in 1994.

Both sides report frequent shootings and attempted incursions along the cease-fire
line, but the latest outbreak of fighting is the worst in many years. It wasn't
immediately clear what set off the latest violence between the former Soviet republics,
with Azerbaijan and Armenia each accusing the other of being the aggressor and
claiming to have repelled a series of attacks.

Russia's annexation of Crimea, however, has contributed to the tensions. Armenia,
which depends on Russia for economic and military support, has welcomed the
takeover of Crimea and some Armenians have suggested it could be a model for
Nagorno-Karabakh. This has rattled Azerbaijan, which like Ukraine has aligned itself
with the West.

A spokeswoman for Russia's Foreign Ministry expressed serious concern about the
fighting and the deaths it has caused. "Further escalation is unacceptable,"
spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a statement. "We call on all participants in the
conflict to show restraint, refrain from the use of force and take immediate measures
aimed at stabilizing the situation."
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Azerbaijan-Armenia Border Skirmishes Turn Deadliest in 20 Years

By Sara Khojoyan and Zulfugar Agayev Aug 1, 2014 12:12 PM CT
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...er-skirmishes-turn-deadliest-in-20-years.html


Azerbaijan and Armenia reported the deadliest fighting near the disputed Nagorno-
Karabakh region since the two countries signed a cease-fire 20 years ago.

Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry confirmed eight of the country’s soldiers were killed in
clashes with Armenian troops and vowed to avenge the deaths. Armenia said two of its
servicemen were killed. Azerbaijan’s APA news service said Azeri soldiers repelled an
attack by Armenian forces, while Armenia said its troops were resisting a “sabotage
attack.”

The escalating death toll raises tensions between the two former Soviet republics in
the volatile Caucasus region, which borders Turkey and Iran. Armenia took over
Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous enclave about the size of Rhode Island, and seven
surrounding districts from Azerbaijan in a war after the Soviet breakup in 1991. More
than 30,000 people were killed and more than a million displaced before Russia
brokered a 1994 truce.

Azerbaijan, which in December signed $45 billion contracts with
a BP Plc-led group to pipe natural gas to Europe,
has repeatedly threatened to use force to regain control of
the territory should peace efforts fail.

To contact the reporters on this story:
Sara Khojoyan in Yerevan at skhojoyan@bloomberg.net;
Zulfugar Agayev in Baku at zagayev@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Balazs Penz at bpenz@bloomberg.net
Andrew Langley





:siren::siren::siren:
Rock Solid Politics ‏@BradCabana Aug 2
FOR THOSE THAT DON'T KNOW:
#Armenia is aligned with #Russia.
#Azerbaijan is aligned with the West.
It's #Ukraine 2.0



gheorghe ‏@ghmacici Aug 2
@BradCabana BTW Russia has army & air base
in Armenia and protects their sovereignty.
At the same time Ru sold military equipment to Azeries.



Rock Solid Politics ‏@BradCabana Aug 2
@ghmacici It's just a big chess game,
and it's not that complicated to follow, or foresee.



École Libre ‏@ecolelibre Aug 2
@BradCabana Makes me think this may be used
to avoid Turkey siding with Russia (as Azer is Turkey's protégé).
http://rt.com/business/174316-turkey-russia-customs-union/ …



gheorghe ‏@ghmacici Aug 2
@BradCabana yes. Strange Russian attitude...
People in Arm worried a new war will start.
Azeries trying Russian weakness vs Armenia.



gheorghe ‏@ghmacici Aug 2
@BradCabana yes. BTW Azerbaijan is a weak military
no matter they bought many weapons.
Hope they will not try something crazy though. :(



Rock Solid Politics ‏@BradCabana Aug 2
@ghmaciciwell, if they do enough to get the #Russian garrison involved,
then it will be spun as "another #Russia aggression against neighbor



gheorghe ‏@ghmacici Aug 2
@BradCabana Russian troops are not there.
They are more on the west side of the country (towards Turkey).
Not involved in the skirmishes.
^^^ YET!



Vee Dubs ‏@VeraDubs 18h
@BradCabana@BlikopNOS Azeris are ethnic Turks I believe


Geysar Gurbanov @geysar · 17h
More tanks. Does #Russia have a bite in recent escalation of violence
between #Armenia & #Azerbaijan in #Karabakh?
pic.twitter.com/66S9AFITz9



Geysar Gurbanov @geysar · 17h
Photos come from everywhere:
more tanks move towards conflict zone between #Armenia#Azerbaijan
#Karabakh#Geopoliticspic.twitter.com/5Fzj3DDlTk




Geysar Gurbanov @geysar · 18h
More tanks spotted in #Azerbaijan
moving in #Karabakh#Armenia direction amid border clashes. #Geopolitics
pic.twitter.com/mBa9XDG9ic



Geysar Gurbanov @geysar · Aug 2
#Azerbaijan's #military helicopters evacuating soldiers
wounded by #Armenia on the line of contact in #Karabakh
pic.twitter.com/zH1OtGJnc2





NATO to continue its efforts in helping sides
of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to reach agreement


Baku, Azerbaijan, June 16
By Ilkin Izzet
http://en.trend.az/news/karabakh/2285627.html


NATO will continue its efforts in helping sides of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to reach
agreement, the president of NATO Parliamentary Assembly Hugh Bailey said on
Monday at the opening ceremony of "Rose-Roth" seminar in Baku.

According to Bailey, the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict can not be
resolved by military means.

"Azerbaijan is located in a complex region. Nagorno-Karabakh conflict can only be
resolved by compromise. In turn, NATO will continue its efforts to ensure that parties
of the conflict will come to an agreement," - he said.

NATO PA President also expressed satisfaction that the seminar is attended by
Armenian delegation.

NATO Parliamentary Assembly's 86th seminar "Rose-Roth" on the topic "South
Caucasus: Challenges and opportunities" has kicked off on Monday in Baku.

It should be noted, that the seminar is attended by representatives of Armenia.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988 when Armenia
made territorial claims against Azerbaijan.

As a result of the ensuing war, in 1992 Armenian armed forces occupied 20 percent of
Azerbaijan, including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

The two countries signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The co-chairs of the OSCE
Minsk Group, Russia, France and the U.S. are currently holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council's four resolutions on the
liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding regions.

Follow us on Twitter @TRENDNewsAgency



Permanent Mission of Armenia in NATO
http://www.nato.mfa.am/en/karabagh/
(Background info)
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
logo_section_medium.png


Lawmakers' trips to Baku conference raise ethics questions

Question lingers: Who paid tab for luxury jaunt
prior to sanction vote?


By Will Tucker and Lise Olsen
July 26, 2014 | Updated: July 27, 2014 12:16am

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/new...hp?cmpid=twitter-premium&t=3a9014c8757fcfd54e

784x2048.jpg
Larry Luxner
Security guards were posted outside the Heydar Aliyev Center in Baku, Azerbaijan,
the site of the 2013 conference organized by Houston businessman Kemal Oksuz.



In May 2013, Richard Lugar, former U.S. senator and onetime chairman of the Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations, took the podium at a sleek, modern convention
center in the capital of Azerbaijan and urged the U.S. Congress to exempt a natural
gas field in the Caspian Sea from economic sanctions against Iran.

The Baku conference was sponsored in part by SOCAR, the Azeri national oil company,
and the vast Shah Deniz gas field was a potential game-changer in the country's quest
to become a major player in global energy circles.

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files.
No worries, just click here to download the PDF file.
But one of SOCAR's partners in the Shah Deniz project was the Iranian
national oil company, NIOC, and Congress was considering a new round of
sanctions against Iran, Azerbaijan's neighbor, that could potentially derail
a $28 billion project.

The Azeris, SOCAR and other major energy partners in the Shah Deniz
project desperately wanted an exemption.

Ten congressmen and 35 staffers accepted all- expense-paid trips to the
Baku conference.
In Lugar's audience that day were three members of the
U.S. House of Representatives who sit on the House Foreign Affairs
committee considering Iranian sanctions - Texas Reps. Steve Stockman
and Ted Poe, both Republicans; and Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y.

Less than two months later, the day before the House vote, the Shah
Deniz exemption mysteriously appeared in the final draft of the sanctions
bill, which passed.

It's unclear who engineered that last-minute change.

Ethics rules at issue

A Houston Chronicle analysis of reports that Stockman, Poe, Meeks and
the seven other U.S. lawmakers later filed with the House Ethics
Committee show that none disclosed any sponsorship of their Baku
conference trips by corporations, foreign governments or lobbyists.
Taking a foreign trip to a conference sponsored by corporations
that employ lobbyists appears to be a violation of congressional
ethics rules
, according to the House ethics manual.


333x2048.jpg

Larry Luxner
The conference in Azerbaijan's capital included a discussion by Kemal Oksuz, right,
with President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign manager, David Plouffe.

Only five of the 10 American lawmakers who made the Baku trip agreed to
respond to the Chronicle's questions and said they complied with
disclosure requirements.

The 2013 conference, called "U.S.-Azerbaijan: Vision for Future," was held
at the Heydar Aliyev Center in Baku, a gleaming white architectural
masterpiece by the Caspian Sea that, though named for a despot, serves
as a symbol of Azerbaijan's transformation from former Soviet-bloc state
to an energy-rich political player.


SOCAR, along with other Azeri government interests, has become one of
Washington, D.C.'s big spenders in efforts to win American allies to get its
petroleum products to markets worldwide.


Public records, programs, photos, emails and interviews collected by the
Chronicle confirm that lobbyists, the Azeri government and energy
companies all participated in the elaborate Baku gathering.

In addition to the 10 U.S. House members and staffers, state legislators
and local politicians accepted all-expense-paid trips to the conference,
which was festooned with the logos of SOCAR's powerful energy allies,
including BP and ConocoPhillips.

Along with Stockman and Poe, Texas lawmakers Sheila Jackson Lee and
Ruben Hinojosa, both Democrats, made the trip.

At least four congressmen took along a spouse or fiancé. Some flew
first-class and extended their trips with stays in luxury hotels in Turkey.
The congressional travel tabs alone totaled $270,000, trip reports compiled
by the Chronicle show. That doesn't include fees or expenses paid to
former government officials, like Lugar, who attended as speakers. He
declined an interview request.

And according to documents, those bills were covered by five related,
U.S.-based Turkic nonprofit organizations, one of which, the Turquoise
Council of Americans and Eurasians, is based in Houston and described
itself as the event's "organizer."

Under federal law, the Turquoise Council was required to disclose any
corporate support or foreign government assistance for the Baku
congressional trips. The Chronicle's analysis indicates it did not.

Scandals led to reforms

Scandals involving jaunts enjoyed by lawmakers to Caribbean islands and
lavish European golf outings prompted the House of Representatives in
2008 to approve reforms that banned lobbyists and corporations that
employ U.S. lobbyists from planning or funding foreign trips.

But foreign governments or corporations can still donate to nonprofits that
give foreign trips to congressmen - a loophole that has created a boom in
nonprofit-funded trips - provided both the nonprofits and the lawmakers
disclose such support.

"Knowing the sponsors of these fact-finding trips gives voters the
opportunity to hold their representatives accountable for any improper
relationships. Without transparency there is no accountability," said
Benjamin Freeman, a senior policy adviser at the nonpartisan Third Way in
Washington, D.C. "How often does this happen? The honest answer is that
we have no idea, because we don't know who many of these sponsors are.
That must change."

The Baku conference, the marquee event of the congressional trips,
featured a speech from Azerbaijan's president, Ilham Aliyev, whose family
controls much of his country's wealth, and focused on Azerbaijan's political
and energy agenda. It enjoyed substantial corporate support, including
sponsorships from BP, ConocoPhillips and Caspian Drilling, as well as from
SOCAR itself.

Energy giant BP confirmed with the Chronicle that it contributed $10,000
for the convention and gave more again this year for a follow-up event in
Washington.

In an email, Houston-based organizer Kemal Oksuz said the Turquoise
Council received $10,000 from various sponsors for the Baku conference,
whose names appeared on the conference website. But Oksuz did not
disclose that in travel forms he filed for congressmen who accepted
funding from his group. Oksuz said he did not have to disclose corporate
sponsorships, in part, because "those contributions always came after the
conventions."

Nondisclosures illegal

Lawmakers who went to Baku and nonprofits alike should have disclosed
any corporate conference sponsorships, said Ken Boehm, an expert in
congressional ethics who reviewed the records at the Chronicle's request.

By failing to do so, even after seeing event banners and websites listing
sponsors, congressmen may have violated ethics rules, he said.
Leaders of nonprofits that organized trips to Baku may have violated
federal law by failing to disclose corporate sponsors, said Boehm, chairman
of the National Legal and Policy Center, a nonprofit that promotes ethics in
government.

"Once the corporate sponsors admit their paid involvement, it's game over
for whoever signed the House pre-trip forms
stating falsely that there was
no such sponsorship," he said.


To pass muster, congressional "fact-finding" trips abroad must be
organized principally for education purposes. Congressional officials must
first ask the House Ethics Committee for permission to go, and sponsors
must affirm that lobbyists will neither be involved in planning nor
accompany House members on the trip.

Nonprofits sponsoring trips must disclose support from corporations or
foreign agents. And, once they return to the United States, lawmakers
must report true sponsors of trips to the best of their knowledge.

Records show that Meeks did not disclose his Baku trip expenses until a
year after the deadline. Meeks did not respond to a request for comment.

Congressman Poe and two other Houston-area House members -
Stockman and Jackson Lee - spoke at the conference in Baku at the
invitation of the Turquoise Council. All three took flights that cost from
$10,500 to $12,000, more than the current advertised first-class fares.
Stockman got another $5,000 in campaign contributions in three
installments that same month from Oksuz personally.

Neither Stockman nor Jackson Lee responded to any questions.

Poe said all trip expenses were properly disclosed.

"The congressman does not believe he was lobbied in Baku," said
spokesperson Shaylyn Hynes. "He viewed the events as informational."

Hinojosa emphasized that "all expenses were also reported and approved.
The purpose for the trip was to learn more about U.S. interests, and in my
case, educational programs that the Azerbaijani government is
developing."

Dominic Gabello, chief of staff for Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham, D-N.M.,
said her boss used the trip as an "opportunity to learn more about the
challenges Azerbaijan faces" and specifically questioned Azeri leaders
about how they deal with poverty.

"She has not been lobbied about specific issues," Gabello said.

Vague tax records

Oksuz, a Houston public relations director, serves as president of the
Turquoise Council. He told the lone U.S. journalist present in Baku that the
event cost around $1.5 million and that he'd offered speakers fees of
$2,500. Some accepted gifts of hand-woven rugs, too, he told the
Washington Diplomat.

He leads two nonprofits that share the same suite in a Galleria office
tower, tax records show.

Both groups were identified as sponsors or organizers of the Baku
conference, and both have accepted money from SOCAR. One group, the
Assembly of the Friends of Azerbaijan, operates as a U.S.-based public
relations arm of SOCAR, according to foreign government lobbying
disclosures filed in 2014.

Via email, Oksuz answered a few basic questions, but then repeatedly
delayed and canceled interviews requested by the Chronicle. He did not
respond to requests to provide updated financial records that his nonprofit
must disclose under state and federal laws.

The Turquoise Council's 2012 nonprofit tax return, available on the
Internet, is "bare bones," discloses no expenses related to trips for elected
officials and provides unusually vague descriptions of major funding
sources, said David Nelson, a Houston attorney who specializes in
nonprofit law.

'Educational' trips

Records show the Turquoise Council shared Baku congressional trip
expenses with four other interconnected and obscure nonprofit
organizations run by Turkic Americans, all of which claim to use
"educational" trips to promote cross-cultural understanding, according to a
Houston Chronicle review of dozens of federal disclosure records and
nonprofit tax returns.

The groups included the Turkic American Federation of Midwest, based in
Chicago; an umbrella group called the Council of Turkic American
Associations, based in New York City and the Turkic American Alliance,
based in Washington, D.C.. Each group leader identified his own nonprofit
as lone trip sponsor.

Faruk Taban, leader of the Turkic American Alliance, said his group works
to coordinate efforts among 240 different community associations.
Generally, those groups work to "foster dialogue and understanding
between Turkic states - in this specific case, Azerbaijan - and the U.S.
Our
work focuses as much on promoting understanding between the countries
as between the communities," he said via email.

Many of those nonprofits are led by followers of Fetullah Gulen, a
moderate Turkish ex-imam who lives in exile in an enclave in Pennsylvania
but wields a philosophical and political influence throughout the Islamic
world. Many Gulenists are involved in prep schools in Turkey and in
Azerbaijan, as well as in charter schools in the United States, including the
Harmony Schools in Texas.

Denies hiring lobbyists

Collectively, Turkic groups have funded 272 foreign trips for members of
Congress and their staffs from 2009-2013, according to information
analyzed by the Chronicle from a database of travel data compiled by
LegiStorm. Together they have helped make Turkey the top foreign travel
destination for members of Congress, after Israel. Trips to Azerbaijan are
far less common.

Oksuz said the Turquoise Council has no formal ties to Gulen. He denied
retaining any lobbyists or foreign agents in disclosures he made as a Baku
2013 trip sponsor.

Other records show that a SOCAR official in Azerbaijan, who normally
would have nothing to do with visa approvals, helped Oksuz obtain visas
for 21 people, including members of Congress and a lobbyist, Ari
Mittleman of the Washington firm Roberti&White, a registered foreign
agent.

Records show lobbyists attended the conference - and two reported
meeting with congressmen the day of their 12-hour return flight to the US.
There is no rule against lobbyists and congressmen meeting on foreign
soil, though there is one forbidding them from accompanying each other
on trips.

"Once they get members overseas, it's kind of back to the wild, wild West
of lobbying," said Freeman. "So long as the foreign agent and policymaker
are overseas; the requirements for reporting meetings are void."

Historical connection

Azeri interests have continued conversations with D.C. lawmakers with
help from one of the nonprofits run by Oksuz. In April, the Assembly of the
Friends of Azerbaijan held another "U.S.-Azerbaijan: Vision for Future"
convention, this time at the Willard Hotel in Washington. It is the lobby of
the Willard, where influential men once stood around hoping to buttonhole
President Ulysses S. Grant, that inspired the term "lobbyists."

Many of the same sponsors from last year returned, including SOCAR, BP
and ConocoPhillips. But several U.S. lawmakers advertised as speakers did
not show up. Then came a late announcement: Rep. Steve Stockman
would speak. Stockman walked to the podium and, in a booming voice,
called for the U.S. to "stand by" Azerbaijan.

"We have a lot of friends in the media who want to criticize this country,
but I've been there," he said. "The future is there … One day I hope for a
direct flight from Houston to Baku."
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Gregor Peter @L0gg0l · 4h
ARMENIA REPORTS HEAVY SHELLING OF ITS POSITIONS FROM AZERBAIJAN --
INTERFAX



Sabine Freizer Gunes @SabineFreizer · Aug 2
Main reason highest # of killed in Karabakh conflict since '94 worrying:
Armenia + Azerbaijan ready for war not prevention or resolution



Sabine Freizer Gunes @SabineFreizer · Aug 2
.@mfa_russia already expressing "serious concern
about dramatic deterioration of situ" in + around Nagorno-Karabakh"
http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/743332



politicalprisonersaz @freepolprisaz · 6h
Azerbaijan: Human Rights Plummet to New Low
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/69296 via @eurasianet
#Azerbaijan #humanrights #politicalprisoners
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
:siren::siren::siren:
aufideloo @aufildeloo · 1h
US threatens #Armenia
for doing business with #Russia
without alternatives #ColdWar
http://asbarez.com/125526/us-warns-armenia-russia-fires-back/ …



Missilito @Missilito · 50m
250 #Airdefense servicemen from Russian Military Base in Armenia
will conduct live fire exercise @ Kapustin Yar range
http://tinyurl.com/ot7xo6g



Gregor Peter @L0gg0l · 29m
Just as Nagorno-Karabakh is heating up.
Russia is backing Armenia
^^^ Eastern Orthodox Christian nation too...
(Landlocked and surrounded by Islamic nations)




US Warns Armenia, Russia Fires Back

http://asbarez.com/125526/us-warns-armenia-russia-fires-back/


US, Russia rift reaches Yerevan


YEREVAN—After the US Embassy in Armenia issued a terse warning to
Armenian businesses about the consequences of doing business with
Russia in light of the most recent Western sanctions, the Russian Embassy
fired back accusing the US of “threatening” Armenia. “We encourage all
countries and their nationals to consider the reputational risk of doing
business with sanctioned individuals and entities and cease business
dealings inconsistent with the sanctions that we and others have imposed,”
the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan said on Thursday.

“The U.S. Embassy in Armenia, like other U.S. embassies around the
globe, distributed information about these latest sanctions to Government
of Armenia representatives as well as to local business organizations,” it
added a statement to RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun.am).

The Russian Embassy was quick to respond and accuse the US of using
“thinly veiled threats” against the Armenian government and its business
community.

“It is not within diplomatic norms to dictate to a host country’s authorities
with whom and how they should maintain ties, especially using suggestive
threats against a sovereign state. We expect that the business community
of Armenia is also able to independently conduct its business and does not
need any and does not need any pressure,” said the Russian Embassy
statement.

“We are concerned about the American attempts to complicate the
activities of Russian business in Armenia. All the Russian companies in
Armenia, including VTB Bank (Armenia) and Areximbank-Gazprombank
Group are under the jurisdiction of Armenia, operate within the limits of
Armenia’s legislation, obtain profit and pay taxes in Armenia and secure
the employment of the major part of Armenia’s population,” said the
Russian Embassy

“The calls to stop dealings with the Russian companies disavow the U.S.
representatives’ hypocritical statements about their willingness to
contribute to Armenia’s economic development. One also definitely
observes obvious elements of dishonest trade and economic competition in
the US’s actions,” added the Russian Embassy.

This brings Armenia front and center in the mounting tensions between the
US and Russia following the developments in Ukraine, which were
compounded with the crash of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 in Ukraine. The
US and Ukrainian officials are squarely blaming Moscow for the incident.

VTB Bank and Gazprom were among companies named in the heightened
sanctions announced this week by Europe and the US. The companies
operate in Armenia under subsidiaries that control a significant portion of
Armenia’s infrastructure. The sanctions also include the Russian oil
company Rosneft, which has recently committed to a $400 million
investment to rebuild the malfunctioning Nairit Rubber plant.

According to RFE/RL, Armenian government officials did not comment on
the US Embassy statement.

On Wednesday, however, the VTB Bank-(Armenia) issued a statement
saying the Western sanctions would not impact its business in Armenia.

The Armenia-based bank said in a statement that it will continue providing
the full range of services and respecting its obligations in all currencies,
with which it works.

“In connection with the U.S. sanctions announced against a number of
Russian banks, including VTB, we inform that VTB Bank (Armenia)
operates in a normal mode providing the full range of services regarding
deposit and loan contracts, money transfer operations and payments made
by use of bank cards, ” VTB Bank (Armenia) said.

 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Erica Marat ‏@Ericamarat Jul 31
US Negotiating New Military Base in #Uzbekistan
"that would bring $1 billion to the Uzbek budget annually"

http://en.ria.ru/military_news/2014...otiating-New-Military-Base-in-Uzbekistan.html




Economic court of Uzbekistan
has arrested property and Bank accounts
of "EUROCEMENT group"


10:2829.07.2014 (updated: 10:35 29.07.2014)82831
http://translate.yandex.net/tr-url/ru-en.en/ria.ru/world/20140729/1017956767.html


The arrest of the funds in the amount of 414 billion soums, ($177,803,280.45)
the company is obliged to suspend shipment of products.
912910327.jpg

© RIA Novosti. Maxim Bogodvid | Buy illustration




MOSCOW, 29 Jul - RIA Novosti. Tashkent regional economic court
seized property and Bank accounts of OJSC "Akhangarancement"
(Akhangaran, Tashkent region), controlled "EUROCEMENT group",
informed RIA Novosti on Tuesday, a source familiar with the situation.

The arrest of the funds in the amount of 414 billion soums (180 million
dollars at the rate of Central Bank of Uzbekistan), the company is obliged
to suspend shipment of products, said the Agency interlocutor. He said
that the arrest was effected in connection with a suit to annul the
privatization of Ahangarancement".

Last Monday, the Tashkent regional economic court satisfied the claim of
the State Committee on privatization, demonopolization and competition
development (Goskomekologii) of Uzbekistan on the recognition of illegal
privatization "of Ahangarancement" in August 1994. Currently the
shareholders of the plant are preparing documents to appeal this decision.

Earlier market participants polled by RIA Novosti, pointed to the transience
of the decision. In the spring of this year, law enforcement and financial
authorities of Uzbekistan has carried out an unscheduled inspection of the
company, however, based on its results the violations were not registered.

In August 2006 "EUROCEMENT group" acquired from Swiss Zeromax
GmbH 75,6% of shares of Uzbek cement plant. At present the Russian
company owns 83,92% of the shares, minority shareholders own 16,08%.
"Akhangarancement" was founded in 1961 and is the second largest
cement plant in the Republic. Production capacity is about 1.8 million tons
of cement by wet method of production. By the end of 2013, cement
production at the plant increased by 6% to 1.62 million tons. In June
"EUROCEMENT group" has signed a contract with China CAMC Engineering
for the construction of a new plant on the basis of Ahangarancement"
cement production "dry" method with the capacity of 2.4 million tonnes
per year and the cost of 128 million dollars.


 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
The Other Border Dispute Russia Is Involved In
(That No One Is Talking About Yet)

(Except me...) :lol:

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/05/2014 19:55 -0400
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-...pute-russia-involved-no-one-talking-about-yet


With all eyes focused on Ukraine's border with Russia, it is hardly surprising that the
'other' dispute has fallen off the front pages. However, as Stratfor notes, there has
been a burst of diplomatic activity in recent months over the territory of
Nagorno-Karabakh
, which Armenia and Azerbaijan have disputed for decades.
Russia, the strongest power in the Caucasus, has become more engaged in the issue
as Azerbaijan's leverage in the region grows. Russia's involvement could herald a
change in this longstanding conflict
.



In 1994, after mediation by numerous external players including Russia,
Turkey and Iran, a cease-fire was reached to end the conflict.
But by that time
Armenian forces had decisively defeated Azerbaijan, leading to the de facto
independence of Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenian control of several provinces
bordering the region.

Now, as Russia and the West confront each other over Ukraine, the Nagorno-
Karabakh dispute represents a subtler yet similarly significant issue for the
Caucasus.
As Georgia attempts to move closer to the West and Armenia strengthens
ties with Russia, Azerbaijan is maintaining a careful balance between the two sides.
Azerbaijan thus serves as the pivot of the Caucasus, and the dispute over Nagorno-
Karabakh is a crucial aspect in shaping Baku's role.

Russia has historically supported the Armenians but in light of Azerbaijan's rising
influence, Russia has become more engaged on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue than it
has been in years. Russian officials have held numerous meetings with officials
from Azerbaijan and Armenia on the issue in recent months, indicating a
possible shift in Moscow's position. But in order for Moscow to truly change its
stance on Nagorno-Karabakh, it would need to weaken considerably, or Azerbaijan
would need to become so vital to Russian interests that Moscow would change
allegiances and confront Armenia, an unlikely prospect at this point.


Source: Stratfor
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.laprensasa.com/309_ameri...azerbaijani-leaders-over-disputed-region.html

Putin meets with Armenian, Azerbaijani leaders over disputed region

RUSSIA AZERBAIJAN/ARMENIA | 09 de agosto de 2014

Moscow, Aug 9 (EFE).- Russian President Vladimir Putin held meetings Saturday in the Black Sea city of Sochi with his Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts in a bid to lower growing bilateral tensions over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Putin said prior to the start of his meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev that they would discuss long-standing and sensitive issues related to solving the conflict, according to Russian news agency Interfax.

Aliyev said the Armenian-Azerbaijani dispute has gone on "too long" and requires a solution.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, for his part, said before his meeting with Putin that he would inform the Russian leader in detail about the "situation in our region" and "the intentional exacerbation by Azerbaijan of the situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border."

Without providing details on Saturday's meetings, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in a press conference that the three leaders may hold a trilateral summit Sunday, apparently in a continued pursuit of a negotiated solution to the conflict.

"The purpose of the meeting is just to lower the tensions in the Karabakh conflict area," a lawmaker and member of the Azerbaijan parliament's Inter-Parliamentary Relations Committee, Rasim Musabekov, told Efe.

"Putin wants to show the international community that he not only should be associated with a lack of constructiveness for his role in the Ukrainian conflict but can also be a peacemaker," he added.

But "it makes no sense to expect major progress in that meeting," Musabekov said.

Vafa Guluzade, an Azerbaijani political analyst, was even more skeptical, saying that as an ally of Armenia, Russia is interested in increasing tensions in Karabakh to apply pressure on Baku.

Hostilities between Azerbaijanis and Armenians resumed on July 31 with the deaths of eight Azerbaijani soldiers, the largest single-day casualty figure for that nation's side in the 20 years since a cease-fire was established.

Amid the escalating conflict, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, which is responsible for supervising the 1994 cease-fire, called for an urgent meeting of the two nations' presidents.

The conflict in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, which lies within Azerbaijan but is populated mainly by ethnic Armenians and controlled by Yerevan, goes back to the collapse of the Soviet Union, when the region's Armenian population sought unification with Armenia, leading to a 1991-1994 war that left more than 25,000 people dead.

Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenian troops occupy the entire enclave and seven adjacent districts and have created a "security buffer" that represents a third of Azerbaijani territory.
 
Top