20Gauge
TB Fanatic
A question to all or am I being paranoid?
I was listening to a report about the NJ Appeals Court ruling 2-1 that it was perfectly fine to reduce the allowed rounds per magazine from 15 to 10. (paraphrased) The basis of their logic was that you could defend yourself just fine with 10 rounds and there was the potential of fewer deaths since people were reduced to 10 rounds per magazine.
They cited that their was no evidence that people were better defended with larger capacity magazines, but I find that not to be the case as I do remember a number of cases where the police fired full magazines (15+) in their own self defense or the defense of others.
What really got me was that the logic they are using would indicate that they could then say 2 rounds is more than enough or even a single round and even limit the force of that single round.
Am I being paranoid ? It really seems that this is the direction a number of BLUE states are heading that way.
Thanks!
I was listening to a report about the NJ Appeals Court ruling 2-1 that it was perfectly fine to reduce the allowed rounds per magazine from 15 to 10. (paraphrased) The basis of their logic was that you could defend yourself just fine with 10 rounds and there was the potential of fewer deaths since people were reduced to 10 rounds per magazine.
They cited that their was no evidence that people were better defended with larger capacity magazines, but I find that not to be the case as I do remember a number of cases where the police fired full magazines (15+) in their own self defense or the defense of others.
What really got me was that the logic they are using would indicate that they could then say 2 rounds is more than enough or even a single round and even limit the force of that single round.
Am I being paranoid ? It really seems that this is the direction a number of BLUE states are heading that way.
Thanks!