MSM “The Worst That It’s Ever Been”: Inside Sports Illustrated’s Winter of Discontent

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
This is, indeed, a lot of what's going on in journalism today. I've been writing online for the last 15 years, and everyone out there is in a frenzy over Search Engine Optimization, or SEO. SEO is pretty much the only field in the world where, if you do everything absolutely right, you can still fail as long as you're the 11th person to do it.

Figured some perspective might be helpful, especially with today being light on news.

Fair use cited so on and so forth.


“The Worst That It’s Ever Been”: Inside Sports Illustrated’s Winter of Discontent​


S.L. Price was a newspaper guy, making his bones as a young reporter at the Sacramento Bee and Miami Herald in the ’80s and ’90s. He covered sports, but those publications also allowed him to dip in on other beats; one day he might be reporting from the Olympics, the next he would be in thick of hurricane coverage. “I loved working for newspapers so much,” Price said.

But in 1994, enticed by a significant salary bump, he left the world of dailies for a job at Sports Illustrated. It didn’t take long for Price to realize that he had reached a promised land. “It was the gold standard,” he recalled. Price spent the next 26 years at Sports Illustrated, authoring 47 cover stories and profiling the likes of Serena Williams, Lionel Messi, and even Barack Obama. For much of that time, the magazine hummed with all of its editorial horsepower.


“Everybody in the building was smarter than you, and they made you look better,” he said of Sports Illustrated’s salad days, when the magazine was still flush with advertising revenue, and its pages rich with high-quality journalism. Price and his colleagues were supported by a deep newsroom infrastructure and empowered by the financial strength of the magazine, allowing it to become “a hub of great ideas and daring journalism.” Whereas “the problem with journalism today,” he added, is that “so much of it is undermined subtly by this lack of confidence, fueled by a lack of money.”

There is little of that confidence remaining at the current iteration of Sports Illustrated, where morale among editorial staffers is low and disillusionment with management is reaching new heights. Like much of the print media industry, SI’s budget and ambitions have been casualties of the digital era. Its publishing frequency has dropped steadily since 2015, going from 50 issues annually to now just 12. Layoffs under former parent company Time Inc. depleted the masthead, ultimately leaving it with no full-time staff photographers. The decline has accelerated since 2019, when previous owner Meredith sold SI’s intellectual property to Authentic Brands Group. Weeks after the sale, Authentic Brands licensed the magazine’s publishing rights to Maven, a digital media company that later changed its name to the Arena Group.

Under Arena’s stewardship, SI has endured several rounds of painful layoffs and drifted further from its founding ethos. Once a bastion of long-form journalism, SI writers are now under increasing pressure to chase clicks. The magazine hit its nadir in the last month following a bombshell revelation about AI-generated content published on SI’s website, as well as a shake-up at the executive level that brought uncertainty about its future. No longer one of the premier destinations in media, current staffers are seeking greener pastures. “It feels like the worst that it’s ever been,” one staffer told me. “I don’t know a single person who isn’t trying to get out. When you read our press clippings, why would you want to work here?”


Winter has traditionally been Sports Illustrated’s time to shine. From December, when the magazine unveils its Sportsperson of the Year, to February, when it used to release its annual swimsuit issue, the cold-weather season was when SI showcased its influence on the zeitgeist.
This past year has been anything but celebratory, with 2023 bookended by periods of tension. In February, the magazine laid off 17 employees, including top editors, further depleting a staff that was already stretched thin. And just after Thanksgiving weekend, SI suffered a considerable blow to its once-sterling reputation. Futurism reported that Sports Illustrated published product reviews under spurious bylines. The outlet said that it could not identify the authors who purportedly wrote the reviews, and that one of the author’s photos was available on a website that sells AI-generated headshots.
https://www.vanityfair.com/v2/offers/vf214?source=Site_0_JNY_VYF_DESKTOP_GLOBAL_IN_CONTENT_0_HOLIDAY_SALE_DEC23_S_ZZ&redirectURL=https://www.vanityfair.com/news/sports-illustrated-future
A spokesperson for the Arena Group blamed the reviews on a third-party company called AdVon Commerce. The spokesperson said that AdVon “assured us that all of the articles in question were written and edited by humans.” AdVon, they said, had provided assurances that the material was written and edited entirely by humans, and that the writers had used pseudonyms. The Arena Group ended its partnership with AdVon and removed the content from SI’s website. AdVon did not respond to a request for comment.


'The Color Purple' Cast Tests How Well They Know Each Other

In 2023, Meghan Markle Got Her Shoulders Back
In 2023, Meghan Markle Got Her Shoulders Back

SI’s writers and editors had misgivings with the Arena Group from the beginning, when the company was still called Maven. Following the 2019 takeover, the company laid off one fourth of the magazine’s staff, and Maven unveiled an aggressive plan to broaden Sports Illustrated’s digital footprint with a network of sites covering professional and collegiate teams to be run by low-paid contributors with little editorial oversight. (Deadspin described management as planning “to turn Sports Illustrated into a rickety content mill.”) James Heckman, Maven’s founder and chief executive, brought in Ross Levinsohn, a media executive who had a stormy tenure at the Los Angeles Times, as CEO.

All of the tumult prompted SI staffers to unionize in early 2020. “Decisions made by new management over the last few months have put SI’s reputation and long-term health at risk,” the union said at the time. The union pushed back forcefully against the contributor network later that year, saying that it had already led to “multiple instances of plagiarism, unprofessional behavior, and inaccurate reporting” that marred SI’s image.

The early months of the pandemic brought more layoffs, as well as an acrimonious firing of the late Grant Wahl, one of the magazine’s most high-profile writers. And under Maven, which rebranded to the Arena Group in 2021, SI has continued to stray from its erstwhile editorial mandate. The magazine still employs talented writers and reporters, and it continues to produce strong enterprise journalism. In May, SI published a richly reported investigation examining Brett Favre’s role in a scheme to misuse welfare funds. But the Arena Group has also pushed its staffers to feed the online content maw, placing a premium on quantity at a publication that once only cared about quality. Earlier this year, the company began imposing story quotas on its writers, despite the fact that the union’s contract with management explicitly bars such a requirement. The Arena Group has characterized the quotas, which vary from writer to writer, as “goals.”
“There’s so much pressure from management on page views and clicks,” one former staffer told me.




Upheaval in the C-suite has left the editorial staff in a near constant state of uncertainty. Heckman resigned as CEO of the publisher in 2020 months after he fired Wahl. He was replaced by Levinsohn, who was abruptly terminated by the Arena Group board last week. (Levinsohn, in a LinkedIn post, said he was “grateful for the experience of running and building a public company with such success.”) Levinsohn’s ouster was preceded by the firings of two other top Arena executives: chief operating officer Andrew Kraft and president of media Rob Barrett.

Filling the power vacuum is Manoj Bhargava, the founder of 5-Hour Energy whose venture capital company, Simplify Inventions, acquired a majority stake in the Arena Group in August. Last week, Bhargava was appointed as interim CEO of the company following Levinsohn’s departure. Bhargava is still a bit of an enigma inside Sports Illustrated, but the staffers I spoke to are convinced that he cares about little more than the bottom line. Arena Group employees received an email from HR earlier this month informing them that “holiday happy hours” had been canceled. “We will host a party after our company achieves break-even/profitability,” the email said.

The day before that email was sent, Bhargava held a virtual town hall with Arena Group employees during which he admonished them to “stop doing dumb stuff.”

“The amount of useless stuff you guys do is staggering,” Bhargava said during the meeting, which was reported on by Front Office Sports.
SI staffers told me they believed those comments were largely directed at those in executive-level positions. Representatives for Bhargava told Futurism that the departures of Kraft and Barrett were unrelated to the AI-generated content, an explanation that the staffers I spoke to found plausible. In my conversations with them, they expressed doubts that Bhargava has any ethical qualms with the potential use of AI.

In an emailed statement, Bhargava signaled that changes are afoot at the company.

“As we’ve looked into the full picture of the Arena Group, we realize there is a lot to fix—more than we originally thought,” he said. “So, stay tuned.”

Sports Illustrated’s editorial staff was incensed by the AI revelation. In a scathing statement, the magazine’s union said it was “horrified” by Futurism’s report.


“If true, these practices violate everything we believe in about journalism,” read the statement, which was signed by the “Humans of the SI Union.” “We deplore being associated with something so disrespectful to our readers.”

View of Sports Illustrated senior writer S.L. Price in stands during USA Andy Roddick vs Italy Fabio Fognini Men's 3rd Round match at BJK National Tennis Center.by Simon Bruty /Sports Illustrated/Getty Images.

Back when Meredith was seeking a buyer for SI, some of the magazine’s writers held out hope that it might get purchased by a wealthy sports fan, perhaps a longtime subscriber who could bankroll it back to its former glory. It’s a familiar story across news media: Publications that once boasted endless influence and bottomless expense accounts now find themselves waiting to be rescued by a Medici-like benefactor. Sports Illustrated’s latest chapter is a grim microcosm of all that plagues its beleaguered industry. Newsrooms across the country are grappling with a relentless bloodletting of staff, a disproportionate emphasis on digital metrics, and the looming specter of artificial intelligence.

But it all feels more pronounced at Sports Illustrated. Perhaps that’s due to its once-towering stature, or maybe it’s because the slide has been, as Price put it, “a Marvel comics version of the decline of American journalism.” He added, “There’s just been a spasm of cartoonish awfulness at Sports Illustrated in the last four years where people can say, ‘Oh, look at this great, revered brand, and look how far it’s fallen.’”
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Based on this article, they didn't go woke so much as it was forced on them from whoever bought them this week.
Doesn't matter.

It's what people on the street see, pick up and read, that matters. Woke is woke. Ever see a tranny on a beer can?

According to the CEO it was done without permission by a sales VP. Did it matter? Lost revenue.

BTW the tranny in the swimsuit was in 2021 so what bought who this week doesn't really play a factor in that.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
Doesn't matter.

It's what people on the street see, pick up and read, that matters. Woke is woke. Ever see a tranny on a beer can?

According to the CEO it was done without permission by a sales VP. Did it matter? Lost revenue.

BTW the tranny in the swimsuit was in 2021 so what bought who this week doesn't really play a factor in that.

It absolutely does matter. The people who actually WRITE the stuff don't want to do it. They do it because they need to feed their families. Did you miss the part where they're all looking to get out? The problem with that is everywhere else is the same. Every website, every magazine, every newspaper. They're all chasing clicks and views just to keep the lights on.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
It absolutely does matter. The people who actually WRITE the stuff don't want to do it. They do it because they need to feed their families. Did you miss the part where they're all looking to get out? The problem with that is everywhere else is the same. Every website, every magazine, every newspaper. They're all chasing clicks and views just to keep the lights on.
They're woke they lost money get over it.
 

Zardoz

Contributing Member
It absolutely does matter. The people who actually WRITE the stuff don't want to do it. They do it because they need to feed their families. Did you miss the part where they're all looking to get out? The problem with that is everywhere else is the same. Every website, every magazine, every newspaper. They're all chasing clicks and views just to keep the lights on.
Agree. I've seen the same in my industry, Manufacturing. Ego's and Bean Counters squeeze the LIFE of a good business.
 

tanstaafl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Maybe part of the problem is companies now being run by new people with zero experience in the business they're now running (which is unfortunately the case with my own company). I've heard people say things like "sales are sales, the product doesn't matter" and "manage one company and you can manage any company." What little truth there is in those is washed out by the massive lack of understanding of or experience with their customers expectations in that specific market (which is what happened with Bud Lite).
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
SEO is pretty much history, sorta like multi level marketing (MLM), just saying. ;)

Yeah, tell that to my bosses. And just about every freelance writing job listing. :D

Seriously though, I'm gratified hearing it. Like I said, it's the only thing in the world where you can still fail doing everything "right" if you're the 11th person doing it.
 

dvo

Veteran Member
Been a very long time since I subscribed. Like as a teen. Professional sports and social issues. No thanks.
 

Illini Warrior

Illini Warrior
continue to prep post-SHTF? >>> TP will become a problem - hit the news stands as you go - only thing most printed media is good for these dayz
 

mzkitty

I give up.
Ask me how long it's been since I read a magazine. Ask me how long it's been since I bought a copy of the daily Democrat & Chronicle (long time newspaper here). Someone told me last week it's up to $3.00 per day now. Are they crazy?

When I was young, everybody bought the newspaper and magazines, but.....

Digital killed the print media. Oh well.
 

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
I understand both sides. However, understanding their point of view doesn’t mean that I agree with both. Writers have always taken it on the chin. All of the writers we now consider classics didn’t necessarily get rich and most wound up being forced to live on the hand outs of others. Even Mark Twain had his lean and troubled years.
 

greysage

On The Level
Magazines are generally worthless in the present age. SI reign happened prior to mass internet and screen-programs. Apps as well.

In 1981 you had to wait a whole month to get your sports news in the mailbox. Or if you had cable you could arrange your schedule to view 30-60 minute weekly sports recap TV shows.

Now the sports-baalers have mini screens, medium screens, large screens, pod casts, apps, pro-baal season packages, all loaded with sport content, recaps, updates, and live action.

The old magazine can't compete, and even if they develop some of the things above, they are not unique, just another sports-baal subscription in an ocean of sports media.
 

Bumblepuff

Veteran Member
1703534391201.png

"I take my diet serious because I gotta show my beautiful bod to the world, so every mornin' I be munchin' my Cocoa Puffs
in chocolate milk, then a snack or two of Jell-O chocolate puddin' cups, chocolate nut bars for lunch, chocolate chip cookies
for afternoon snacks, at least one dozen with chocolate milk, of course, then chocolate milkshakes for dinner to get calcium
for strong bones to support my figure, and for dessert any chocolate left in my house. I'm the Chocolate Goddess of Love!"​
 

Delta

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I read to where he said that Sports Illustrated was (or had been?) a Time-Life company.

Ha! Time-Life once paid me $3000 to review a chapter (on a subject I know something about) in one of their books that they were working on. I read the draft and wrote a critique twice as long as the draft. I was stunned that the second draft contained none of my "corrections". I called the editor and asked, "huh?" (or words to that effect). He responded, "You have to understand this is written for high school kids. It doesn't have to be accurate." I asked them to take my name off the book, and (frankly) I have no idea if the book ever came out. (I did cash the check, though.) I have no respect for Time-Life, or (frankly) for any of the "big" media. They are after money, not "truth". So, to Sports Illustrated, all I have to say is: "boo, hoo."
 

subnet

Boot
It absolutely does matter. The people who actually WRITE the stuff don't want to do it. They do it because they need to feed their families. Did you miss the part where they're all looking to get out? The problem with that is everywhere else is the same. Every website, every magazine, every newspaper. They're all chasing clicks and views just to keep the lights on.
You sure about that? or is this what they have to do due to dei crap and getting loans?
 

Josie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Heck, go to any waiting room or barbershop today and what magazines you might see are rarely of the current year if there are any at all.
That's because all those waiting are busy on their phones. I'm guilty too. Since covid, I really don't want to touch any "well read" material sitting in a doctor's office.
Your 2024 SI winners, anorexic scarecrows and obese black girls:

:lol:

View attachment 452109

View attachment 452110
I had always heard that most guys want a little "meat" on the bones...but not that much.
 

West

Senior
Magazines are generally worthless in the present age. SI reign happened prior to mass internet and screen-programs. Apps as well.

In 1981 you had to wait a whole month to get your sports news in the mailbox. Or if you had cable you could arrange your schedule to view 30-60 minute weekly sports recap TV shows.

Now the sports-baalers have mini screens, medium screens, large screens, pod casts, apps, pro-baal season packages, all loaded with sport content, recaps, updates, and live action.

The old magazine can't compete, and even if they develop some of the things above, they are not unique, just another sports-baal subscription in an ocean of sports media.
Muse...

I think all professional sports are taking a hit from lower viewership and less fans over all.

So they bring in legal gambling on most all professional sport games. To try to save it, and the ball players paychecks etc...

And perhaps it's working to a point. Surprised SI doesn't now concentrate on the gambling angle, and ditch the swimsuit BS.

But I could care less about professional sports and don't support it in any way.

And Pete Rose or his estate should be made whole and he should get his just rewards! Now that gambling is legal. I bet if he was black he would of never gotten into trouble. And could of gotten away with murder.
 

Bumblepuff

Veteran Member
1703550855800.png

Introducing the wet and wild premier issue of Spurts Illustrated, the only online magazine dedicated to pulling pranks and
jokes on your friends and foes. Using principles of basic physics, you'll learn how to squirt all types of liquids onto unsus-
pecting victims. Be the life of your slumber party, your family reunion, even your day in court. Graphically detailed charts
show pressure and valves. We guarantee there won't be a dry eye in the house after you pull our pranks! Subscribe today!
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
I read to where he said that Sports Illustrated was (or had been?) a Time-Life company.

Ha! Time-Life once paid me $3000 to review a chapter (on a subject I know something about) in one of their books that they were working on. I read the draft and wrote a critique twice as long as the draft. I was stunned that the second draft contained none of my "corrections". I called the editor and asked, "huh?" (or words to that effect). He responded, "You have to understand this is written for high school kids. It doesn't have to be accurate." I asked them to take my name off the book, and (frankly) I have no idea if the book ever came out. (I did cash the check, though.) I have no respect for Time-Life, or (frankly) for any of the "big" media. They are after money, not "truth". So, to Sports Illustrated, all I have to say is: "boo, hoo."

Try writing white papers for peer reviewed journals and you're told the articles are TOO LONG!!! Wait, what??? Yep. professors, grad students, researchers, and the like, have the attention span of a freaking fruit fly and cannot be bothered to read a full article.

Remember boys and girls... trust the science!

:rolleyes:
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
" American pay far too much attention to what sports figures and entertainers think and say" - Mark Twain
 

tanstaafl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
" American pay far too much attention to what sports figures and entertainers think and say" - Mark Twain

Did he really say that? He died in 1910, which I think is before sports became so all-consuming for the masses. And their entertainers would have had to be in writing or in person since 1910 also generally predates even radio for the masses (according to my Web search just now, "The first voice and music signals heard over radio waves were transmitted in December 1906 from Brant Rock, Massachusetts ...").
 

subnet

Boot
BMI is junk science at its worst, believing that all weight--muscle, fat, bone, and organ--is all inherently equal.
You can tell yourself anything you like and there is a bmi chart for those that are athetes...you can use that if it makes you feel better about yourself.
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Did he really say that? He died in 1910, which I think is before sports became so all-consuming for the masses. And their entertainers would have had to be in writing or in person since 1910 also generally predates even radio for the masses (according to my Web search just now, "The first voice and music signals heard over radio waves were transmitted in December 1906 from Brant Rock, Massachusetts ...").
You bring up a very good point.................I think it might have been just entertainers but often they are misquoted when searched for online....

....case in point. I recently read a book on Babe Ruth and he became the first ever sports star in the late 20s about the time radio became in use.....he was considered the first "sports celebrity" defined as the public having an obsession in them for who they are off the sports field as much as on it.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I understand both sides. However, understanding their point of view doesn’t mean that I agree with both. Writers have always taken it on the chin. All of the writers we now consider classics didn’t necessarily get rich and most wound up being forced to live on the hand outs of others. Even Mark Twain had his lean and troubled years.
I get that and agree with you.

However.....

Magazines, much like beer as I noted do have their followers, and those that purchase them. And those Mags or beer appeal to a certain group of people.

Lefties have Huffington Post. To name one. Their content is directed at, and appeals to, the left side of issues.
Righties have The Federalist. To name one. Their content is directed at, and appeals to, the right side of issues.

When the Huffington Post was to draw a larger readership they could write issues in support of the right. On the front it seems logical. But that doesn't take into account the loss of readership from the Left.

Same for the Federalist. In the opposite direction.

Mags and beer need to stay in their lane to maintain what they have, growing their base ends up losing their base. Their readership or drinkers.

SI got in the woke political arena. Not understanding, like Bush, that their base was a certain group of people that bought their mag for SPORTS. No one in THEIR GROUP wanted to read, see things about politics, they wanted sports. And I have to say SI like National Geographic back in the day had some the most awesome pictures. (you will note they are the first to be fired) Which in that case is about the camera, not the pixilated screen as it is today. Granted there is a subgroup who bought the Annual subscription just to get one mag passed their wives as sports, the swimsuit issue, and that bit the dust.

Granted online content has had an effect, but they lost their readers years before the latest purchase, and the crying of their writers. I'm sorry the writer has supported the woke with articles, and contributed to the demise. Why would they to that? They support it. Anyone who doesn't think that hasn't watched any TV sports commentators for years. They are as woke as The Huffington Post.

And sure they can leave SI, but they will take their woke ideology with them and drive the next mag into the ground. Kind of like dems leaving CA, and moving to TX and in a couple of years TX will be blue.

SI can get back to their roots by simply pulling out there mags from 20 years ago and see what they did with pictures wrote articles about then and pick it back up. Online content can be set up as a tease for the mag purchase, or fee content.

Those conservative writers who are looking to leave, leave. I would never work for any company that made me subjugate my values for theirs.

And if the factor of writers are boo hooing over writing content that is clickable, do better. Or change jobs where that isn't the factor. It's what we all do out here in the real world. If I didn't produce 100% productivity as a minimum I was fired, it's a thing. If I couldn't write an article that was clickable, ..........
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
I get that and agree with you.

However.....

Magazines, much like beer as I noted do have their followers, and those that purchase them. And those Mags or beer appeal to a certain group of people.

Lefties have Huffington Post. To name one. Their content is directed at, and appeals to, the left side of issues.
Righties have The Federalist. To name one. Their content is directed at, and appeals to, the right side of issues.

When the Huffington Post was to draw a larger readership they could write issues in support of the right. On the front it seems logical. But that doesn't take into account the loss of readership from the Left.

Same for the Federalist. In the opposite direction.

Mags and beer need to stay in their lane to maintain what they have, growing their base ends up losing their base. Their readership or drinkers.

SI got in the woke political arena. Not understanding, like Bush, that their base was a certain group of people that bought their mag for SPORTS. No one in THEIR GROUP wanted to read, see things about politics, they wanted sports. And I have to say SI like National Geographic back in the day had some the most awesome pictures. (you will note they are the first to be fired) Which in that case is about the camera, not the pixilated screen as it is today. Granted there is a subgroup who bought the Annual subscription just to get one mag passed their wives as sports, the swimsuit issue, and that bit the dust.

Granted online content has had an effect, but they lost their readers years before the latest purchase, and the crying of their writers. I'm sorry the writer has supported the woke with articles, and contributed to the demise. Why would they to that? They support it. Anyone who doesn't think that hasn't watched any TV sports commentators for years. They are as woke as The Huffington Post.

And sure they can leave SI, but they will take their woke ideology with them and drive the next mag into the ground. Kind of like dems leaving CA, and moving to TX and in a couple of years TX will be blue.

SI can get back to their roots by simply pulling out there mags from 20 years ago and see what they did with pictures wrote articles about then and pick it back up. Online content can be set up as a tease for the mag purchase, or fee content.

Those conservative writers who are looking to leave, leave. I would never work for any company that made me subjugate my values for theirs.

And if the factor of writers are boo hooing over writing content that is clickable, do better. Or change jobs where that isn't the factor. It's what we all do out here in the real world. If I didn't produce 100% productivity as a minimum I was fired, it's a thing. If I couldn't write an article that was clickable, ..........

...I'm gonna guess that writing isn't your primary industry.

You can't just "do better" in a field where results are mostly random. Nobody knows in advance what people will click on and what they won't. The whole concept of SEO was an attempt to cheat the system for your own ends. Now everyone's doing it, and with everybody cheating, no one can. The problem is that very few--including those who actually sign the paychecks--have figured that out yet. So SEO is still king of the hill because everyone thinks if they STOP cheating they lose.

Meanwhile, "go somewhere else" doesn't work out real well in a field where a lot of places share the same values. You'd have to completely change fields, and there's only so much compatibility of skills.

Though I do agree with you about SI's plans; personally, I think the problem is one of advertising. You need everyone to agree to go back to the old system, where you sell ads at flat rates based on size. No click-throughs, no trackers, nothing. But you'd need EVERYBODY to agree to that, because whoever leaves in the algorithms and such has a huge advantage. They mean more value for the advertisers, and they won't voluntarily accept less. They have to be forced into it by having no other options.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
...I'm gonna guess that writing isn't your primary industry.

You can't just "do better" in a field where results are mostly random. Nobody knows in advance what people will click on and what they won't. The whole concept of SEO was an attempt to cheat the system for your own ends. Now everyone's doing it, and with everybody cheating, no one can. The problem is that very few--including those who actually sign the paychecks--have figured that out yet. So SEO is still king of the hill because everyone thinks if they STOP cheating they lose.

Meanwhile, "go somewhere else" doesn't work out real well in a field where a lot of places share the same values. You'd have to completely change fields, and there's only so much compatibility of skills.

Though I do agree with you about SI's plans; personally, I think the problem is one of advertising. You need everyone to agree to go back to the old system, where you sell ads at flat rates based on size. No click-throughs, no trackers, nothing. But you'd need EVERYBODY to agree to that, because whoever leaves in the algorithms and such has a huge advantage. They mean more value for the advertisers, and they won't voluntarily accept less. They have to be forced into it by having no other options.
You would be right about my primary industry, not being a writer. But one of my "things" is reading. Which puts me on the other side of the equation. As a client, or a target of a click.

And I am a veracious reader. About 6-9 months ago, I started on the Reacher series. Just got in books 27-29, and am half way through 27. And those aren't the only books I've read during that time. Have read entire Bible commentaries. And at present have about 6 that I go back and forth on, on a weekly basis. And I read ton's of articles every week. Articles that are well written by authors I have come to know and look for, get my click. Author's who cover the same subject, but don't write them up very well, don't. They usually have a bunch of gibberish mixed in to make it a long article. I even read and debate left wing articles. Mostly for knowing where the left is coming from, not in support.

So that is my reason for "write better". As a reader, well written books and articles get my clicks. Most gibberish mix with a few highlights of this or that, don't. And once someone is a good writer whether that's Lee Child, Preston and Child, Mark Twain, Molly Hemingway, Johnathan Turley, or Pepe Escobar, I have a tendency to look for their books and articles.

So from a readers perspective a well written book or article gets more clicks.
 

zeker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Even Mark Twain had his lean and troubled years.
he should have hired on with Samuel Clemens :whistle:

AI will take over everything

all part of the plan

if you don't know what's real or, what's memorex

how do you know what to believe?

or what to stand up for

confuse and confound

at least enuf to have everybody fighting/bickering amongst themselves

while you sit back and feed the fire

all part of the plan

George Carlin told us about this crap (club)

Klaus Shwabb told us all what we need to be happy:shk::fgr:
 
Top