ALERT US Supreme Court Opinion Issuance Day - Monday, June 13, 2022

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
biQBD3y.png


Today is the first of two opinion issuance days this week. There is another opinion day on the Court calendar scheduled for this coming Wednesday, June 15. There will not be an opinion day next Monday, June 20, as it is the Federal holiday for the Juneteenth observance, but I feel certain they will reschedule one to make up for it, and will be surprised if they don't add another day next week as well.

Ordinarily the Court issues opinions only on Mondays but when the end of the term is nearing and there is a backlog to be issued they will add additional days. The end of the term is generally considered to be the end of June, very first part of July.

There are two hot-topic opinions that may provoke reactions: Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization (abortion) and NYSRPA v Bruen (2nd Amendment case).

In times past the opinions would be read from the bench by the justices, but since COVID, they are released in 10 minute intervals via their website.

SCOTUSblog has a live chat up on their site that I follow and will post the cases as they are released and information pertinent to each one.

Here's an FAQ that explains the ins and outs of opinion issuance day:



I'll be posting pertinent comments from the SCOTUSblog live blog this morning. Unless otherwise noted, all comments will be from the live blog. One of the co-founders, Amy Howe usually runs the blog but sometimes other lawyers on the blog staff will comment as well.

Opinions are released at 10am Eastern, with 10 minutes in-between each release.

NOTE: I'm starting this thread early so if there are articles about the upcoming opinions that come in overnight there will be a centralized place for them, instead of having several different threads.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

The court’s end-of-term workload: A historical perspective

By Stephen Wermiel
on Jun 10, 2022 at 2:19 pm

Close followers of the Supreme Court have puzzled in recent days over what commentators have described as the slow pace of issuing decisions as the justices head into the final weeks of the term.

It is true that the justices came into June with 33 decisions still to be issued, or 55.9% of the 59 cases the court heard for argument. This high percentage of outstanding decisions might give some court watchers pause about whether the justices will be able to finish their work by the end of June or early July, the unofficial target for completion of the court’s work. After four decisions this week, they still have 29 to go. Theories abound that the work of the court has been delayed by divisions and distrust after the leak of an early draft decision proposing to overturn the constitutional right to abortion.

Crunching the numbers with a different historical perspective may relieve some of the concern about the path ahead for the justices this month. If one looks not at the percentage of decisions remaining but at the volume of end-of-term decisions, the picture is different.

Let’s look at the volume in comparable years across four decades. In the court’s 1981-82 term, the justices decided 141 cases compared to the this term’s expected 59. In June and the first two days of July, 1982, the justices issued a whopping 69 decisions, more than twice the number remaining for the current court. It is true that the percentage of total decisions issued in June and July that year was lower than the current figure: 48.9% compared to 55.9% now. But if the justices could scramble their way through 69 decisions 40 years ago between June 1 and July 2, the decisions remaining this June do not seem like such a daunting task.

But the court has difficult, divisive major rulings to handle right now, making everything more complicated, one might argue. There were also important and divisive rulings at the end of the court’s term in 1982, however. Half of the 69 decisions generated three or four dissenting votes, including several that were decided by a plurality rather than a majority. Important end-of-term decisions in 1982 included Nixon v. Fitzgerald (holding that the president is immune from civil liability for official acts), Rogers v. Lodge (holding that an at-large voting system for a county with a large Black population violated the equal protection clause), and New York v. Ferber (rejecting a First Amendment challenge to a state ban on the sale of child sexual-abuse material).

The 1981-82 term was not alone in seeing more June decisions than the present period. In the 1991-92 term, the total number of decisions declined from 141 to 107. In June of 1992, the justices issued 41 decisions. This was a smaller percentage of the total, 38.3%, but again, it was a higher volume of opinions than what the current court faces. In fact, the court issued 30 decisions between June 15 and June 29, 1992 — one more than the 29 cases still pending this term as we enter the middle of June. (The court has already scheduled two opinions days next week: one on Monday and another on Wednesday).

Moving forward another decade, the total number of decisions in the 2001-02 term plummeted to 76. Even with that significant decline, the court still managed to handle 27 decisions in June 2002. Although this represented only 35.5% of the total for the term, the volume of June decisions was still quite substantial.

Finally, in the 2011-12 term, the total number of decisions declined even further to 64. That term, the justices had a relatively light June workload, issuing only 16 decisions, or 25% of the total for the term.

Compared to June 2012, the current June total seems daunting. But taking a longer-range view, history suggests that the court should be more than able to manage the pace and volume of remaining decisions, even if there may be some turbulence inside the marble halls.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

ShutDownDC group plans 'blockade' at Supreme Court with 'jail support' on hand

ShutDownDC is planning to 'blockade' streets around the Supreme Court in light of a potential decision overturning Roe v. Wade

Adam Sabes
June 11, 2022 4:01pm EDT

A left-wing group is hosting a "shut down SCOTUS" protest on June 13, with plans to "blockade" the streets surrounding the Supreme Court in light of a potential decision that could overturn Roe v. Wade being released.

The group, ShutDownDC, announced the protest on its website and states that it will begin at 7 a.m. on June 13 at Stanton Park in Washington, D.C.

As part of the "shut down SCOTUS" protest, the group will "blockade" the streets around the Supreme court, according to the website.

"On June 13, one of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision days, we plan to blockade the streets around the Supreme Court to rise up for the transformative change that our communities need," the website states. "Right now our political system is in crisis. Times of crisis can either be opportunities to break through the inertia and win transformational change or they can be opportunities for the establishment to further entrench the status quo."

According to its website, the group chose June 13 since it is one of the Supreme Court's opinion issuance days.

The protest will consist of smaller "affinity groups" of up to 20 people per group, and each group will have a "jail support liaison who can meet arrested folks" when they are released.

Organizers of the outdoor protest are also encouraging attendees to wear a mask and consider taking a COVID-19 test before attending.

The same group also held a "vigil" outside Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's home on May 9 in response to the leaked draft Supreme Court decision which could overturn Roe v. Wade.

"Justice Alito’s draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade is beyond alarming. It would not only allow states to outlaw abortion (which is already de facto unavailable to many who need it, particularly people from marginalized communities) but could also be used to allow states to outlaw contraception, same-sex marriage, protections for LGBTQ folks, and even interracial marriage," the website states. "The evening of Monday, May 9, we will hold a vigil for all these rights that Alito is threatening to take away."
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

Pro-Choice Protesters Post School Information on the Children of Justice Amy Coney Barrett

June 11, 2022

Despite the alleged attempted murder of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the pro-choice group Ruth Sent Us descended upon the home of Justice Amy Coney Barrett and her family within 24 hours of the arrest. Now, the group has posted information on where Justice Barrett goes to church and where her children go to school. It is another example of our age of rage. Indeed, it is an example of the rage addiction that has taken hold of many in the country where even potentially targeting the children of a judge or justice is considered fair game.

This is not the first time that the far left has used the children of Justice Barrett as political fodder. Barrett sat through days of such baseless attacks on her character, but even had to face attacks referencing her children. Ibram X. Kendi, the director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, claimed that her adoption of two Haitian children raised the image of a “white colonizer” and suggested that the children were little more than props to their mother.

During the recent protests, pro-choice protesters engaged in sexist and offensive verbal attacks on Barrett and her family. One protester dressed as a Handmaid declared “It’s also possible that the fact that she’s an adoptive mother is influencing her inability to see what it’s like to carry a pregnancy to term.” Justice Barrett has seven children and only two are adopted.

Yet, the posting of information on school of these children is particularly chilling. It shows how unhinged these people have become in their reckless and incendiary rhetoric.

It is a good thing that you cannot defame the dead under the common law. Justice Ginsburg would have been mortified by this group using her name for such harassment of her colleagues. Ginsburg publicly denounced efforts to pack the Court and she was closest on the Court to her conservative colleague Justice Antonin Scalia.

We have had these moments before in our politics. Ironically, the prior abuse was directed at the left. It is now the signature of many on the left who have discarded any sense of civility or decency in attacking those who hold opposing viewpoints.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqQD4dzVkwk

16 seconds
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

Supreme Court to Decide Historic Cases on Abortion, Guns, Religious Liberty by July

Ken Klukowski
12 Jun 2022 Washington, DC

WASHINGTON, DC – Time is ticking as the Supreme Court has three weeks left on its official calendar to decide 29 cases – including six major cases, half of which are likely historic – or extend its sessions into July, with profound decisions to make on abortion, the Second Amendment, and religious liberty.

The Supreme Court’s term begins on the first Monday of October until the first Monday of the following year’s October. But even though the court’s term technically continues throughout the summer and early autumn – permitting the justices to rule on emergencies or do housekeeping matters – the court “rises” when all the cases for the current term have been decided. This typically happens during the last week of June.

What begins then is not vacation time. The justices might take a couple of weeks of vacation during this time, just like other Americans, and use the time for guest lecturing, travel, or perhaps working on a book. But the justices also spend time preparing for the cases they will be hearing in the fall and getting ready to vote on over 1,000 petitions piling up from lower courts asking the Supreme Court to review a matter. Their law clerks and office staff continue to work during this time under the justices’ supervision.

But as far as the public sees, the end of June is the end of the Supreme Court’s term. Final decisions are handed down – inevitably including at least a couple of big ones – and the justices disappear from public life for a few months.

However, now the court faces the midpoint of June with 29 cases still undecided out of the 59 cases the court heard this term. (As an aside, in recent decades, the court typically decides between 70 and 80 cases in a term.) That is a lot of decisions to hand down in two and a half weeks.

FILE - Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, April 23, 2021. Seated from left are Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. In one form or another, every Supreme Court nominee is asked during Senate hearings about his or her views of the landmark abortion rights ruling that has stood for a half century. Now, a draft opinion obtained by Politico suggests that a majority of the court is prepared to strike down the Roe v. Wade decision from 1973, leaving it to the states to determine a woman’s ability to get an abortion. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool, File)
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on April 23, 2021. Seated from left are Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

More than that, six of these cases are major cases. One is Biden v. Texas, about President Joe Biden’s attempt to shut down one of former President Donald Trump’s signature policies, the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), better known as “Remain in Mexico,” without which the number of illegal aliens making it into this country would be far higher.

Another is Carson v. Makin, a case brought by First Liberty Institute and the Institute for Justice about school choice where the state of Maine is discriminating against families who want to send their children to Christian schools.

A third is West Virginia v. EPA, about whether Biden’s EPA has almost unlimited authority to issue sweeping environmental regulations that could transform the American economy.

The remaining major cases are so big that at least one – and potentially all – are nothing short of historic, sure to have a profound impact on the direction of the country.

One is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, about whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends outside the home. The only two major gun rights cases decided by the Supreme Court involved citizens who wanted handguns at home for self-protection, and now the court will consider how that right applies as citizens go about their daily lives.

Another is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, about a former U.S. Marine high school football coach who was fired by a public school for his custom of offering a short, silent prayer on his team’s football field after each Friday night football game. This case could be a major ruling on three separate First Amendment issues: free speech rights in schools and/or for government employees, the right to freely exercise religion for government workers, and the proper meaning of the Constitution’s Establishment Clause, which forbids the government from adopting an official religion.

Finally – of course – is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, challenging a Mississippi ban on abortions after 15 weeks, in which it now looks like a majority of the Supreme Court is willing to overrule Roe v. Wade by holding that the Constitution does not include an implied right to abortion. One way or the other, Dobbs will feature prominently in history books concerning this period of time in America.

UNITED STATES - MAY 23: Pro-life activists protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, May 23, 2022. Security precautions are elevated in anticipation of the court overturning Roe v Wade. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Pro-life activists protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on Monday, May 23, 2022. Security precautions are elevated in anticipation of the court overturning Roe v Wade. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Abortion rights activist protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday, May 5, 2022 in Washington. A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. Whatever the outcome, the Politico report represents an extremely rare breach of the court's secretive deliberation process, and on a case of surpassing importance. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Pro-abortion activist protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on May 5, 2022 in Washington, DC. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Some writers say it should not be a problem for the court to dispose of 29 cases during this time because, for example, in 1982, the court still had 69 cases to decide out of 141.

But that was a different era. The court puts more man-hours into each case now than it did then, aiming for better decisions that give more effective guidance to the lower courts and the rest of the nation. While some believe the court should take more cases than it currently does, even if far less than 141 – your current author believes that 90 cases would be a better target number – finalizing 29 cases in three weeks is a heavy lift.

More than that, with no disrespect to the Supreme Court’s October Term 1981 – which includes June 1982 – those cases are not in the same ballpark as the blockbuster cases currently pending before the justices. There’s just no comparison of the legal significance for the nation between Nixon v. Fitzgerald (presidential immunity from civil suit) and Dobbs. This year’s cases could shape the future of America. Such cases require an extraordinary number of hours of work.

The Supreme Court will likely release cases on at least two days in each of the next three weeks. If any cases remain at that point, then all eyes will continue to focus on the court as its term extends into July.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Good morning, everyone! It is a steamy morning here in Washington, D.C. Thanks for joining us. We are expecting orders from last week's conference at 9:30, followed by opinion(s) in one or more argued cases at 10 am. And we know already that this is a two-opinion-day week, because the Court's calendar says it will be releasing opinions again on Wednesday.

Amy Howe
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
There are a lot of interesting cert petitions right now, including a case asking the justices to overrule New York Times v. Sullivan, but that case, along with some others that I have been following, has been rescheduled again. One case that the justices did consider last week was Dr. A v. Hochul, a challenge to New York's vaccine mandate for health-care workers.

Amy Howe
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Massive news day in D.C. today. At the same time that SCOTUS issues opinions this morning, the January 6 committee will be meeting across the street.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
I may be wrong because the court doesn't like to do politics but as a purely practical matter, I suspect that Roe V Wade will be announced on the last day. The reason is simply the logistics of protecting and making sure the justices are OK and able to leave town with their families if they wish (possibly to a secure location).

Given that opinions can be done virtually these days, they might put it out there sooner, we will just have to wait and see.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Katie Barlow (SCOTUSblog's TikTok maven -- follow her there if you don't already!) is outside the court this morning. She reports that there are two small but loud groups of opposing protesters. And there is increased police presence, with roads around the court blocked off.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
The justices denied review in the case of Terence Andrus, whose death-penalty case has been before the justices at several conferences in a row. Justice Sotomayor dissents, joined by Breyer and Kagan.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
The writing is in Andrus v. Texas, a dissent from denial of cert. by Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Breyer and Kagan.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
The court has denied cert in a case I was watching, T.O. v. Fort Bend Independent School District, about excessive force used by a school official on a first grader. (A chokehold.)
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
As someone who commutes by bike around the Capitol and SCOTUS every day, I can't overstate how big the police presence was this morning compared to normal. Just scores of MPD and Capitol Police stacked up all around the neighborhood near the Court.

random participant on the blog
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
A group called ShutDownDC has called for a blockade around the court today. And a music festival planned for next week is already starting to shut down Independence Avenue near the National Mall. If Amy or I had to get to court for opinions, we would face a harder than usual time. And TV correspondents probably are set up outside the court, so they have to navigate that.

Mark Walsh
SCOTUSblog
 

TKO

Veteran Member
I may be wrong because the court doesn't like to do politics but as a purely practical matter, I suspect that Roe V Wade will be announced on the last day. The reason is simply the logistics of protecting and making sure the justices are OK and able to leave town with their families if they wish (possibly to a secure location).

Given that opinions can be done virtually these days, they might put it out there sooner, we will just have to wait and see.
No worries. I seriously doubt Roe v Wade is overturned. It's too evil to overturn it. Evil is having its day now.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
A few tea leaves that we can read, in addition to NYSR&PA: There were 10 arguments in the January argument session. Seven of those cases have now been decided. Five justices have written signed opinions: Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Kagan, and Barrett. Two involving vaccines – Biden v. Missouri and National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor – were decided in per curiam opinions. Four justices – Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh – have not yet written signed opinions for January yet. This means that they are the likely authors of the remaining three cases – Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, Garland v. Gonzalez, and Concepcion v. United States – but there is no way to know which justice may be writing which decision (or, indeed, whether Arteaga-Martinez and Gonzalez will come as one opinion or two).

Amy Howe
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
There were two police helicopters circling NoMa/Union Station/court area for quite a while this morning. Atypical in this area as it is closed airspace.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Here's a stray thought as we approach opinions. The San Francisco Unified School District has decided, or is moving towards a decision, to remove all use of "chief" in its job titles, viewing it as a cultural appropriation from Native Americans.

What would John Roberts be called if the court did the same thing? Head Justice? Justice General?

Mark Walsh
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Lots of people in the comments speculating that the increased police presence around the court today means a big opinion is coming. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. I'd expect that, with everything going on, police presence is going to be intensified around the court every day through the end of the term.

James Romoser
SCOTUSblog
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
I agree with James about the police presence. I would also add that there are often rumors (and I saw some last week) suggesting that someone has inside information that a particular opinion is absolutely going to come out on a specific day. Those are almost never true unless it is the last day.

Amy Howe
 

The Hammer

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Lots of people in the comments speculating that the increased police presence around the court today means a big opinion is coming. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. I'd expect that, with everything going on, police presence is going to be intensified around the court every day through the end of the term.

James Romoser
SCOTUSblog
Given the fact that someone intended to kill one of the justices, I'd say the security is warranted for that reason alone.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
This is a case about whether a prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses – a trial court that operates in areas where tribes have jurisdiction over Native Americans, but where there are not tribal courts to fully exercise that jurisdiction – is a prosecution by a “federal agency” that can trigger the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, barring a later prosecution by a federal district court for a crime arising out of the same incident.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
The Court rejects Denezpi's argument that his prosecution is violated by the Double Jeopardy Clause.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
The Court writes that the double jeopardy clause "prohibits separate prosecutions for the same offense; it does not bar successive prosecutions by the same sovereign. So even assuming that [Denezpi's] first prosecutor exercised federal rather than tribal power, the second prosecution did not violate the Constitution's guarantee against double jeopardy."
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Denezpi's "single act led to separate prosecutions for violations of a tribal ordinance and a federal statute," Barrett writes. "Because the Tribe and the Federal Government are distinct sovereigns, those 'offence' are not 'the same.'"
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Gorsuch dissents, says that he believes that the dual sovereignty doctrine on which the Court relies "is at odds with the text and original meaning of the Constitution."
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
"But even taking it at face value," Gorsuch writes, "the doctrine cannot sustain the Court's conclusion."
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Sotomayor and Kagan do not join Part II of the Gorsuch dissent, which questions the dual-sovereignty doctrine.
 
Top