SOFT NEWS Viking homes were stranger than fiction: portals to the dead, magical artefacts and ‘slaves’

Melodi

Disaster Cat
[If you ignore the academic mumbo-jumbo this is a really interesting article on the Norse Home, I am thinking of getting the book if it isn't too high priced - a lot of academic books are insane when it comes to pricing - Melodi]

https://theconversation.com/viking-...-the-dead-magical-artefacts-and-slaves-112548 [best seen at link - Melodi]

Viking homes were stranger than fiction: portals to the dead, magical artefacts and ‘slaves’
March 13, 2019 3.26pm GMT
[see at link will not copy]
The hall of the reconstructed Iron Age house at Ullandhaug, Stavanger. © Marianne Hem Eriksen, Author provided (No reuse)
Author

Marianne Hem Eriksen
Research Fellow, Marie Curie/Research Council of Norway, University of Cambridge

Disclosure statement
Marianne Hem Eriksen is also Associate Professor at the University of Oslo. She receives funding from The Research Council of Norway (grant 251212). She is affiliated with The Young Academy of Norway. She is the author of Architecture, Society and Ritual in the Viking Age. Doors, Dwellings, and Domestic Space, published by Cambridge University Press.

The Vikings are more popular than ever. TV shows such as Last Kingdom and Vikings have added dramatic license to particular historical accounts, while new archaeological finds are guaranteed to make headlines. Recent coverage includes the discovery of a new Viking ship burial, and the possibility of Viking women participating in warfare. But when we talk about the Vikings we often repeat familiar narratives of warriors, ships and battles. Certain activities and spaces – often those traditionally associated with men — are seen as shaping the course of history. The home – traditionally associated with women – is seen as mundane and politically insignificant.

file-20190312-86693-dwvyn5.jpg

The usual obsession. Fotokvadrat/Shutterstock
But the Viking house was not an apolitical, neutral space. It was a primary stage for legitimising hierarchies in which some people were enslaved and left to dwell with cattle in the byre, while others presided in a high seat. It was a foreign world – we have rare, but repeated evidence for infants being buried by hearths, magical artefacts placed by doorways, and women lifted over thresholds so they could speak with the dead.

I want to radically shift our approach to this pivotal period of European history. What happens if we see the Viking Age from the point of view of the house?

Houses as political spaces
For all their visibility in pop culture, everyday life for the Vikings is rarely seen, and settlements are often approached as familiar, harmonious — and perhaps a bit trivial. Now a wave of research is raising new questions about the everyday social and ritual lives of the Vikings.

Gathering together the archaeological remains of longhouses from Norway in research for my book, Architecture, Society and Ritual in the Viking Age. Doors, Dwellings, and Domestic Space, revealed something stranger and more powerful than traditional narratives may suggest.

file-20190313-123551-1o5g29v.jpg

A Viking Age door-ring with a runic inscription, which perhaps upon a time hung on a Viking cult building. © Marianne Hem Eriksen, Author provided (No reuse)
The Viking household, while varied, did not conform to the idealised nuclear family of Western modernity. The largest households could be composed of a couple, concubines, subordinates, farmhands and warriors, animals, itinerant workers, guests, and a range of “mine, yours, and our” children. Although they lived under one roof, everyday tasks and the architecture itself created thresholds between groups and made people different from each other.

file-20190310-86682-d0k08u.jpg

The reconstructed Viking hall from Lofoten, Norway. © Marianne Hem Eriksen, Author provided (No reuse)
“Slavery” is a complex institution, and a universal definition is difficult. But there was an unfree population among the Viking household (“thralls”) who had no legal rights, whose children were owned by the household leaders, who it was not a crime to kill, and who could be sexually exploited by their owners.

Scholars have argued that the thralls dwelled in an extra room with a hearth in the byre (cowshed) end of the longhouse, spatially and socially belonging with the animals. Indeed, one of the known thrall names is Fjosnir, “of the byre”.

In these ways and more, Viking houses generated contrasts between owners, free people and thralls – and such differences formed Viking society.

Dwelling with the dead
The Viking house was not exclusively the domain of the living. In the sagas of the Icelanders, we encounter the malicious man Hrapp. On his deathbed, Hrapp demands to be buried in the doorway to the fire hall: “Have me placed in the ground upright, so I’ll be able to keep a watchful eye over my home.” The agency of the dead did not necessarily dissipate at death and the sagas are full of tales of people receiving prophecy from the dead, the dead singing in burial mounds, or haunting their old houses.

file-20190312-86710-fja788.jpg

Shared spaces. Jorvik Viking Centre
Archaeological material supports the idea that the dead had a presence in Iron and Viking Age houses. Throughout the first millennium, human bones were sometimes embedded within the house, including infants buried in hearths and postholes. It must have been meaningful for people to place body parts of their dead under the threshold or in the postholes of the longhouse, or to inter the dead in the house when they abandoned the settlement.

There is a clear ambiguity to dwelling with the dead. On the one hand, people sometimes kept the dead close, embedding them in the living space. Infants and ancestors may have helped protect the house, anchor it in local histories or empower its residents. On the other hand, Hrapp’s story and other sources suggest that the dead could be objects of anxiety. If they became malevolent, they could threaten the household – and so the threshold to their world needed to be controlled.

Portals to the otherworld
Different parts of the house likely served as points of contact between living and dead, perhaps also among the past, present and future. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the foremost was the actual threshold to the house.

Two written sources tell the narrative of a woman being lifted over a door to see into a different realm. One is an eyewitness account of a ship burial on the Volga River, where a slave woman is lifted above a freestanding portal (much like a doorframe). This allows her to speak with the dead chieftain. The other is an obscure text about a ritual gone wrong, where the lady of the house asks to be lifted “over hinges and door-beams, to see if she can save the sacrifice” — perhaps to see into another realm or into the future. The door could thus be a portal to other powers and beings. Perhaps for this reason, freestanding portals were sometimes erected at Viking burial grounds.

Archaeologists also find things – such as pots, knives, and iron rings – buried in or near doorways. Perhaps these objects guarded the house from powers and beings from outside. And the depositing of artefacts simultaneously forged and embedded a link between people’s daily lives and their houses. It is even possible that artefacts would come with new inhabitants from older houses, for example when they were married. These would be placed in doorways or postholes to empower the house and tie people and houses together across time and space.

Viewing the Viking Age from the house
Taking everyday life seriously opens up new possibilities to understand how and where history happens: it is not only on the battlefield. Architecture and the house mirror, as well as shape, social and spatial order. In Viking Age Norway, people were made to be different – owners and thralls, men and women, with different kinds of power and different things to fear or hope – through byres and high seats, feasts and rituals, doorways and deposited items.

file-20190312-86693-l3fy0.jpg

Excavation of Viking village in York in 1980. foundin_a_attic/Flickr, CC BY
Viking houses were spaces of politics, and also social worlds that were very different from our own. When the Vikings engaged with the wider world through raids, trade, and settlement, their understanding of the world was anchored in their everyday experience in the home from childhood onwards. The time is ripe to broaden the topics we associate with the Viking Age, and to discuss the unfamiliarity and strangeness, as well as the role of inequality, in this pivotal period of European history.
 

Dosadi

Brown Coat
Every time ya post stuff like this I get a urge to go to a ren faire.

May not always agree with things that people just guess it, but I always find such stuff interesting.

Thank you for sharing more stuff.

D.
 

Faroe

Un-spun
Interesting. Did that door ring have a physical use - a big door knocker??

The book looks intriguing for the facts of what is getting dug up (ex.:bones in post holes), but I am suspicious of the conclusions this author is making. The slant just seems sensationalizing, and is there any evidence for the following quote? "But there was an unfree population among the Viking household (“thralls”) who had no legal rights, whose children were owned by the household leaders, who it was not a crime to kill, and who could be sexually exploited by their owners." Sounds to me like the author just HAD to make Viking society resemble Islam. (I guess that is the recent fad, goes along with someone's reading of Koranic inscription is a scrap of Viking weaving.)

Anyway, if you get the book, please post a review! (Just got in EWB's The Mummies of Urumchi. I want to weave those textiles.)
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
My main beef with this article (other than the "political" stuff) is that they don't mention that starting at least 28,000 years ago (oldest place we know of so far of people settling down and building semi-permanent homes) it seems to have been a common human custom to bury the dead (or some of them) either under/beside the hearth fire or in the walls.

That is still done by Native Americans in the Peruvian Andes to this day; one reason that archeologists were sure the homes from 28,000 years ago were intended to last more than one generation was the fact that the ancestors were buried under them (this was between the ice ages and these people also made pottery figurines and had woven trousers whose knees got embedded in some fired clay).

To not mention that makes the Norse sound weird and creepy when before the Conversion it would have been seen as "keeping a loved one close by."

Other ways we KNOW the Norse dealt with their close kin who died was constructing a special burial mound in the back yard (sometimes for more than one generation) along with ship burials (mostly on land but sometimes by burning as you see in Hollywood movies.

A ship burial was only for very wealthy and important people because one thing the series The Vikings got right is that they were extremely expensive and a good ship builder like Floki was a respected master craftsman (and allowed to be a bit weird if he or she wanted to be)
 

Faroe

Un-spun
My main beef with this article (other than the "political" stuff) is that they don't mention that starting at least 28,000 years ago (oldest place we know of so far of people settling down and building semi-permanent homes) it seems to have been a common human custom to bury the dead (or some of them) either under/beside the hearth fire or in the walls.

That is still done by Native Americans in the Peruvian Andes to this day; one reason that archeologists were sure the homes from 28,000 years ago were intended to last more than one generation was the fact that the ancestors were buried under them (this was between the ice ages and these people also made pottery figurines and had woven trousers whose knees got embedded in some fired clay).

To not mention that makes the Norse sound weird and creepy when before the Conversion it would have been seen as "keeping a loved one close by."

Other ways we KNOW the Norse dealt with their close kin who died was constructing a special burial mound in the back yard (sometimes for more than one generation) along with ship burials (mostly on land but sometimes by burning as you see in Hollywood movies.

A ship burial was only for very wealthy and important people because one thing the series The Vikings got right is that they were extremely expensive and a good ship builder like Floki was a respected master craftsman (and allowed to be a bit weird if he or she wanted to be)

Perspective, I guess; I don't find it creepy at all. One sad thing about our impending house move is that several beloved pets buried in the back yard will be left behind. (Seems just a little weird to dig them up and transfer them.) I look at the the Conversion as calamitous tragedy (again, perspective). The coming Eddy Minimum may encourage survivors to go back to some of the old ways.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Yeah, the "slave thing" was part of my "political comments" - now it is totally true that the Norse did have Tralls/Slaves and they did live less well than the rest of the extended family.

The Norse lifestyle (mostly farmers and merchants when not seafarers) also didn't require a lot of them so the Norse were quite happy to sell most of their captives (both local and Irish/Scottish/North African etc) to the Islamic world in exchange for silver which the Norse seem to have preferred over gold as a means of exchange and for jewelry making.

Meanwhile, before the conversion and even afterwards; Norse slaves had certain rights (and there are court cases that have come down to us about that) they could save and buy their freedom, many women were freed and became the "concubines" (aka often secondary wives) or even the First Wife of the Cheifton when they became pregnant.

Their children were not automatically slaves, it depended on the circumstances and at least one major saga hero was in fact "the son of a slave" (his fiance whinges to her Daddy about that until she finds out how rich he is, I guess some things never change).

There was a long tradition of deciding that when thrall women were elevated to "Mistress of the House and Number one wife" that it would almost always be "discovered" that she was "the daughter of an Irish King."

My husband has joked that if the Vineland colony had lasted very long there would be a lot of very early "Native American Princesses" running around about 500 years earlier than usually expected.

Although, I have a hunch about the East Coast Native American women whose DNA is a founding genetic Mother of Iceland but whose name is not recorded (even though very tight records were kept) my hunch is she was in fact "the Daughter of a Native American 'King'" and her name was changed to something like "Helga" when she married her Viking Sea Lord and came back with him to Iceland.

There's no way to now unless some lost records or burial with records are found but it would make a great plot in a novel.

Finally, the Norse did get along famously with the Islamic world - you don't need to rewrite history for that but that was probably because the Islamic countries were far enough away to be good trading partners for them and yet not close enough (except in the North African Norse Kingdom) to be seen as a threat.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
PS I have to check with my husband on the dating of the North African kingdom it may be technically pre-Norse (aka Migration Age) and either predate Islam or only had a brief overlap - I will post when I find out.
 

parocan

Veteran Member
It's amazing the things we are learning today about our past. a year or so ago a native site was rediscovered up by haida gwaii, a ancient fishing weir
that is older then 12000 years old.
 

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________
Ancient Hawaiians/Polynesians were also known to bury a slave (adult or child) beneath the foundation of a building but these are thought to have been sacrifices.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Same time, sometimes same place, different culture (sometimes) :D Fascinating video on Saxon treasure- maybe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSjd6pjM0w8
National Geographic Saxon Gold New Secrets Revealed
RT 44:59
Published on Dec 29, 2013
======================

Ever hear of hacksilver? In times before modern coinage of specified and widely accepted weight and value, all people had were scales and weights. Objects made of precious metals might be literally chopped up (hacked) into smaller pieces to allow a designated value/weight to be obtained. This was common among Vikings as well as other cultures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacksilver
 

homecanner1

Veteran Member
Great article. I think it was more grieving women burying a cherished infant by the hearth under a flagstone as its tomb and the spirit staying near to the family in the fireplace flames. These were pre Christian, remote enclaves. No Kirk or Priesthood. I would expect the climate took its toll on newborns also. Burial inside when the permafrost is 18 inches deep makes sense.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Great article. I think it was more grieving women burying a cherished infant by the hearth under a flagstone as its tomb and the spirit staying near to the family in the fireplace flames. These were pre Christian, remote enclaves. No Kirk or Priesthood. I would expect the climate took its toll on newborns also. Burial inside when the permafrost is 18 inches deep makes sense.

I think this is more likely - in general, the landowner/oldest male would have served as the Priest/Godthi, even after the Christian conversion the word has several meanings that tended to combine both local householder/leader of a "steading" (extended household) as well as religious leader (in Christian times his duties would not have been the same as the local Parish Priest but he would have ensured the family attended church, and he had other semi-religious functions).

There were almost always older women both in the Steading and who traveled (sometimes with men) who were basically Priestesses; there is a description in one of the Sagas of the "Greenland Seeress" who travels from farm to farm performing rituals and "seeing" aka answering questions for the community including things like "what of the Harvest?"

A father had the power of life and death pre-conversion over babies born on the homestead, he had nine days and nights to "acknowledge" the child (or have someone else do it if it wasn't his) or the baby was exposed (this was usually true only of infants with obvious and severe disabilities).

It wouldn't surprise me if babies who were stillborn or lived only a short time were buried next to the hearth to encourage them to "return" to the kindred; "officially" they didn't have souls yet but tell that to a grieving Mom!

Many cultures worldwide have a "waiting period" when it is believed the new soul is deciding it wants to stay in the fragile body of an infant, and some don't even name children until they are around 4 years old because infant mortality can be so high that an earlier naming is considering tempting fate.

The Norse Father named the child within the 9 days and that meant he accepted it and it was now fully "human," the act of "naming" is what caused the soul to attach to the body in their cosmology.

Interestingly enough, infanticide increased drastically AFTER the conversion, before then unwed mothers were not socially approved of exactly but it wasn't a big deal either (as long as the Father or a substitute would name and support the child - and children were precious and wanted).

But after the conversion this became a thing of "sin" also the weather was changing as the Little Ice Age took hold in the 1300s and famine tends to lead to child exposure (again all over the world).

Most places in the world where people are farmers (or settled) who bury their dead under/by the hearth or just outside (which many families in early Colonial America did) the dead are not sacrifices but either an ancestor you want to keep around and/or babies you want to return to you in a new birth.

There are some places (usually more urban ones) where you find babies buried under the gateways of public buildings/temples etc and they usually are sacrifices.

The Norse pre-conversion did perform human sacrifices but most often this seems to have been associated with great battles, there was no real way to hold or take on large numbers of Prisoners of war so the fallen enemy was "honored" by being given to Odin or Tyr.

Every seven years or so (and this is done right in the Vikings series) there was a great ritual at Uppsala where 7 men and 7 of each type of important animal were killed and hung on a tree; we don't really know if these were prisoners of war or volunteers (there is some of both in the TV series).

There were also precessions of Priests and Priestess that went about the countryside usually once a year from various temples (Uppsala was a major religious center but there were others) but again the Steadings would usually rely on their own elders/specialists to lead their religious services, feasts, oath takings etc.

So it wasn't that there was no "kirk" (though of course, these were not Christian ones) but it was more like the Old West in the United States where an official pastor might only travel once a year to a remote place and recognize or make officials all the weddings and baptisms that had been done unofficially throughout the year and most local governments recognized such marriages as legal even if the Preacher hadn't made his rounds yet.

The Norse saw most of marriage and family as the responsibility of families and property, not religion so much anyway (and continued to do so for several centuries after the conversion).

For most people, the signing of the Marriage Contract which spelled out everything including the details of who got what in a divorce was what "made" the marriage, that and a husband placing a hammer in his bride's lap (and in some areas gifting her with a kitten); he then might "carry her over the threshold" -that door thing again in the article.

Who lived where would depend on whose property was being used - a groom might move into his wife's steading or the other way around; it wasn't like further South where it was almost always the wife who moved to her husband's land.

Wives pre-conversion often owned and kept their own property even after marriage a right they lost gradually after the Conversion.

There is some great information out there on all this for folks that are interested, but you have to be careful just reading the web (as with most topics), also remember the Sagas themselves were written 200 years AFTER the Norse/Viking period by men trained as Classical Scholars often in European Universities.

They already had a big chunk of "Our Great and Mighty Warrior Ancestors" in their mythology, very similar to novels written today about "The Wild West."

So you have to take some things (like Blood Eagles) with a grain of salt...
 

Seeker22

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Perspective, I guess; I don't find it creepy at all. One sad thing about our impending house move is that several beloved pets buried in the back yard will be left behind. (Seems just a little weird to dig them up and transfer them.) I look at the the Conversion as calamitous tragedy (again, perspective). The coming Eddy Minimum may encourage survivors to go back to some of the old ways.

Faroe, please consider taking your fur babies with you. Even if you have those remains cremated and put in an Urn, it is better than abandoning them to strangers. Your vet can probably suggest a good pet mortuary.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
In ANY society, EVERYTHING happens in context. It is necessary to understand the context to understand the details of what makes a society function and how it goes about those functions.

Since so much of that understanding sometimes depends on flimsy if any evidence, there is often a lot we just don't know. In many cases we are very lucky to have the material and written evidence we do have, even though that evidence might be subject to … interpretation, to put it kindly.

I am always grateful for those who extend themselves personally in order to try and better understand those who were here before, and inform the rest of us about them - people like Melodi.
 
Top