TECH Yes, Roku is forcing users to agree to new terms to continue using their TVs

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
https://www.ksdk.com/weather

TECHNOLOGY

Yes, Roku is forcing users to agree to new terms to continue using their TVs​

Customers who wish to opt out of the new dispute resolution terms and continue using their TVs can do so via general mail, but only after initially agreeing to them.
d3445ef4-2ad2-46c8-9f00-fe3a6f63c48a_16x9.jpg
d3445ef4-2ad2-46c8-9f00-fe3a6f63c48a_750x422.jpg

Credit: Renata Sattler - stock.adobe.com
Author: Emery Winter
Published: 12:25 PM CDT March 15, 2024
Updated: 12:25 PM CDT March 15, 2024

Roku is the most popular smart TV operating system in the United States with 73.5 million active accounts as of mid-2023.
Many Roku customers have gone to Roku’s online forums over the past few weeks to complain about a notice of a change in the company’s dispute resolution terms that won’t let people use their televisions until they’ve agreed to the terms.

Multiple VERIFY readers have reached out to ask if Roku is preventing people from using their televisions unless they agree to the new terms.

THE QUESTION​

Is Roku forcing users to agree to new terms to continue using their TVs?

THE SOURCES​

THE ANSWER​

This is true.

Yes, Roku is forcing users to agree to new terms to continue using their TVs. However, you do have a window to opt out and continue using your TV after you initially agree.

WHAT WE FOUND​

Roku customers are required to agree to the company’s updated dispute resolution terms to keep using their TV. However, customers still have 30 days to opt out of those terms after initially agreeing with them and can keep using their TVs after doing so.

When the notification pops up onto a Roku TV screen, customers are only given the option to agree. You cannot navigate your smart TV’s menus while the notification is on-screen and you can’t make it go away without agreeing.

Once the notice appears on their TV screen, customers have to agree before they can continue using their TV, a Roku spokesperson told VERIFY in an email. However, those customers can still opt out of the terms by writing a letter to the company.

The terms customers must agree to are Roku’s updated dispute resolution terms. Prior to the update, Roku’s terms prohibited its customers from settling claims against Roku in court, therefore prohibiting any class actions against Roku.

The new terms, on top of continuing to prohibit class actions, also make it more difficult for customers to force Roku to settle through mass arbitration, a strategy used by some law firms to make companies settle even if their terms prohibit class action lawsuits. Roku’s terms limit the number of mass arbitration claims it has to actually argue before an arbitrator and delays the mass arbitration process as a whole.

At the bottom of Roku’s new terms, it explains that customers have a 30-day window to opt out of these rules and continue using Roku’s products. A customer must send Roku a letter to the following address with the following information:
  • Address: General Counsel, Roku Inc., 1701 Junction Court, Suite 100, San Jose, CA 95112
  • Notice should include: Name and contact of each person opting out; specific product models, services or software at issue; email address that you used to set up your Roku account (if you have one); and a copy of your purchase receipt, if applicable.
Opt-out notices sent by any method other than mail will not be effective. You cannot opt out via email.

The 30 day window does not start once you agree to the terms on your TV. Roku’s terms says it begins once the customer becomes “subject to the terms.” This would mean the window starts when the customer received an email notification about the new terms, which most customers received prior to getting the TV notice, according to Consumer Reports.
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
As dumb as all theses agree to us type things.
How would they even hold up in court?

Say your 12 yo kid turns the TV on.
Smashes yes to the new contract because they want to watch cartoons.
12yo can't enter a legally binding contract.
And you as the adult would probably never see it because the kid yes it already.

There is no legal requirement for tvs to only be operated by someone over the age of 18.

Just hypothetical.
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
As dumb as all theses agree to us type things.
How would they even hold up in court?

Say your 12 yo kid turns the TV on.
Smashes yes to the new contract because they want to watch cartoons.
12yo can't enter a legally binding contract.
And you as the adult would probably never see it because the kid yes it already.

There is no legal requirement for tvs to only be operated by someone over the age of 18.

Just hypothetical.
And this will bite ROKU back hard in court if that comes out as being the case. But the other aspect of things is that IP owners are starting to go after streaming devices due to IP fraud issues and concerns.
 

Thinwater

Firearms Manufacturer
It is likely in response to the scum bag "I sue for you" attorneys who file class actions against big companies on behalf of millions of customers. The attorneys get 1/3 or more of the $3.00 "recovered" for each of several million customers. The customers get $2.00 and the scum bag attorneys make tens of millions.

Whenever I get a letter advising me the I may be entitled to benefits from some BS class action lawsuit, I throw it away, or stuff the envelope full of scrap paper if it is postage paid.

The only reason they get away with it is the vast number of moochers who see some free money in their future, just sign here, the entitlement mentality in action.
 

BornFree

Came This Far
Years back I discovered how corrupt the arbitrator process is. Someone I knew had a lot of electrical damage because the neutral coming out of the power transformer(On the pole) had a Intermittent bad connection via a faulty compression sleeve. The customer kept calling the power company who blamed it on the customer wiring. The customer even had their service line replaced, but it did not help. Until one day it was so bad that the power company came and found the bad connection. I watched them find it and replace it. Then the problem was gone. But the power company denied that they had even found a problem or that they had replaced the sleeve.

The customer wanted the power company to replace the equipment that was destroyed due to the power surges. Their only option was to go to court and use the arbitrator provided by the power company. I went with them. When we arrived, the court was not in session and I observed the arbitrator and representatives of the power company having a conversation. They were talking about how they all just had lunch together at some restaurant. It never got to the judge because we had to meet in a conference room where the power company made a claim that forms had not been properly filed by the customer. The arbitrator immediately agreed and dismissed the case.

Never forget that the arbitrator works for the company that hired them and they are not going to bite the golden goose. It is a total sham.
 

JeanCat

Veteran Member
As dumb as all theses agree to us type things.
How would they even hold up in court?

Say your 12 yo kid turns the TV on.
Smashes yes to the new contract because they want to watch cartoons.
12yo can't enter a legally binding contract.
And you as the adult would probably never see it because the kid yes it already.

There is no legal requirement for tvs to only be operated by someone over the age of 18.

Just hypothetical.

Good legal point!
 

John Green

Veteran Member
I got it and agreed to it. It’s not as unusual as the YouTubers and articles would have you believe. As someone above mentioned, I can’t see any reason I would need to sue Roku. There are lots of bigger things to worry about.
 

John Green

Veteran Member
By continuing to use their service you are agreeing to the terms.

We wanted to let you know that we have made changes to our Dispute Resolution Terms, which describe how you can resolve disputes with Roku. We encourage you to read the updated Dispute Resolution Terms. By continuing to use our products or services, you are agreeing to these updated terms.
Thank you for making Roku part of your entertainment experience.
The Roku Team
 
One of the least likely actions I'd be liable to take is suing Roku. Just sayin...in the grand scheme, this is real low on the list. Can always switch to a Firestick. Haha...people might be much more likely to sue Amazon?
Will the ROKU TV work using the HDMI connection to a Firestick? Or any other HDMI device? Not really my problem, just curious.
 

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
Will the ROKU TV work using the HDMI connection to a Firestick? Or any other HDMI device? Not really my problem, just curious.
I dunno. I have a VERY "dumb" TV with a Firestick dongled into the HDMI port.

If they are talking a TV that is specifically dedicated (or even branded?) to Roku, whether that can be bypassed by plugging in a Firestick IF it has an open HDMI port, I don't know, but I would think so.
 
Top